{{ item.displayTitle }}

No history yet!

equalizer

rate_review

{{ r.avatar.letter }}

{{ u.avatar.letter }}

+

{{ item.displayTitle }}

{{ item.subject.displayTitle }}

{{ searchError }}

{{ courseTrack.displayTitle }} {{ statistics.percent }}% Sign in to view progress

{{ printedBook.courseTrack.name }} {{ printedBook.name }}
Rational exponents and radicals are two different ways to express the same quantities. Sometimes, one form is more useful than the other. Thus, being able to translate between the two is important.

$a_{nm}=na_{m} $

$58_{2} $

RootToPowD

$na =a_{n1}$

$(8_{2})_{51}$

PowPow

$(a_{m})_{n}=a_{m⋅n}$

$8_{2⋅51}$

MoveLeftFacToNumOne

$a⋅b1 =ba $

$8_{52}$

Rewrite the given expressions in the opposite form. $5x andx_{32}$

Show Solution

The properties of radicals allow expressions with radicals to be rewritten.

The $n$th root of a product can be written as the product of the $n$th root of each factor. For example, $37⋅9 ,$ can be expressed as follows using this rule.
$37⋅9 =37 ⋅39 $
This rule can be explained by expressing the radical using a rational exponent, and then using the Power of a Product Property.
This rule is valid for all values of $a,$ $b$ and $n.$ However, in order to avoid non-real solutions it is necessary that $a≥0$ and $b≥0$ for even values of $n.$

$37⋅9 $

RootToPowSL

$na =a_{1/n}$

$(7⋅9)_{1/3}$

PowProd

$(a⋅b)_{m}=a_{m}⋅b_{m}$

$7_{1/3}⋅9_{1/3}$

PowToRootSL

$a_{1/n}=na $

$37 ⋅39 $

The $n$th root of a fraction can be written as the $n$th root of the numerator divided by the $n$th root of the denominator. For example, $397 ,$ can be expressed as follows using this rule.
$397 =39 37 $
This rule can be explained by rewriting the radical as a rational exponent, and then using the Power of a Quotient Property.
This rule is valid for all values of $a$ and $n,$ and when $b =0.$ However, in order to avoid non-real solutions it is necessary that $a≥0$ and $b>0$ for even values of $n.$

$397 $

RootToPowSL

$na =a_{1/n}$

$(97 )_{1/3}$

PowQuot

$(ba )_{m}=b_{m}a_{m} $

$9_{1/3}7_{1/3} $

PowToRootSL

$a_{1/n}=na $

$39 37 $

Simplify the expression using the properties of radicals. $5 3 ⋅15 $

Show Solution

When two radicals with the same index are either multiplied or divided they can be simplified using the properties of radicals. We'll begin by simplifying the numerator using the Product Property of Radicals.
Next we simplify the expression using the Quotient Property of Radicals.
Thus, the expression simplifies to $3.$

In order to simplify an $n_{th}$ root, it is necessary that the radicand can be expressed as a power. If the index of the radical and the power of the radicand are equal, $na_{n} ,$ the radical expression can be simplified as follows. $na_{n} ={∣a∣ifnis odd∣a∣ifnis even $

The absolute value of a number is always non-negative, so when $n$ is even, the result will always be non-negative.
Expressions with radicals can be written using rational exponents. Then, they can be simplified using the properties of exponents. Consider the following expression.
$6x_{7} 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{4} $
### 1

When a term inside a radical has a power greater than the index of the radical, it can be rewritten into $na_{n} $-form. In the example, there are two such terms, $3x_{4} $ and $6x_{7} .$ $4>3and7>6$
First, the Product of Powers Property can be used to rewrite the terms under these radicals.
The products under the radicals can now be rewritten using the Product Property of Radicals.
### 2

The $na_{n} $-terms can now be simplified as follows.
$na_{n} ={∣a∣ifnis odd∣a∣ifnis even $
In the expression there are two terms that can be simplified using this rule.
### 3

Next, rewrite the radicals using rational exponents. The example can be rewritten as follows. $∣x∣⋅6x 4x_{3} ⋅x⋅3x ⇔∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{43}⋅x⋅x_{31} $

### 4

When the expression is written using rational exponents, it can be simplified. When two terms with the same base are multiplied, the exponents are added according to the Product of Powers Property.
To simplify the exponent further, which requires adding and subtracting fractions, the denominators must be made the same. Here, the least common denominator is $12.$
Since the expressions in the numerator and the denominator have the same bases, $x,$ they can be simplified. First, by using the Quotient of Powers Property, the expression is written as one term. To simplify the exponent, the denominators must then be made the same.
### 5

When the expression has been simplified completely, it can be rewritten using radicals. $∣x∣x_{1211} =∣x∣12x_{11} $ This is the simplified expression.

Rewrite terms into $na_{n} $

$6x_{7} 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{4} $

Rewrite

Rewrite $4$ as $3+1$

$6x_{7} 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{3+1} $

Rewrite

Rewrite $7$ as $6+1$

$6x_{6+1} 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{3+1} $

SumInExponent

$a_{m+n}=a_{m}⋅a_{n}$

$6x_{6}⋅x_{1} 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{3}⋅x_{1} $

$6x_{6}⋅x_{1} 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{3}⋅x_{1} $

RootProd

$3a⋅b =3a ⋅3b $

$6x_{6}⋅x_{1} 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{3} ⋅3x_{1} $

RootProd

$6a⋅b =6a ⋅6b $

$6x_{6} ⋅6x_{1} 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{3} ⋅3x_{1} $

ExponentOne

$a_{1}=a$

$6x_{6} ⋅6x 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{3} ⋅3x $

Simplify $na_{n} $-terms

$6x_{6} ⋅6x 4x_{3} ⋅3x_{3} ⋅3x $

RootPowToNumber

$3a_{3} =a$

$6x_{6} ⋅6x 4x_{3} ⋅x⋅3x $

$6a_{6} =∣a∣$

$∣x∣⋅6x 4x_{3} ⋅x⋅3x $

Express the radicals using rational exponents

Simplify using the laws of exponents

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{43}⋅x⋅x_{31} $

$a=a_{1}$

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{43}⋅x_{1}⋅x_{31} $

MultPow

$a_{m}⋅a_{n}=a_{m+n}$

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{43+1+31} $

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{43+1+31} $

ExpandFrac

$ba =b⋅3a⋅3 $

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{129+1+31} $

OneToFrac

Rewrite $1$ as $1212 $

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{129+1212+31} $

ExpandFrac

$ba =b⋅4a⋅4 $

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{129+1212+124} $

AddFrac

Add fractions

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{1225} $

$∣x∣⋅x_{61}x_{1225} $

DivPow

$a_{n}a_{m} =a_{m−n}$

$∣x∣x_{1225−61} $

ExpandFrac

$ba =b⋅2a⋅2 $

$∣x∣x_{1213−122} $

SubFrac

Subtract fractions

$∣x∣x_{1211} $

Rewrite expression using radicals

Simplify the expression using the properties of exponents. $4_{34}⋅16_{31}2_{310} $

Show Solution

Notice that the terms in this expression each have a difference base. $2,4,and16.$
This expression cannot be simplified until the bases are the same. Therefore, we can begin by rewriting the terms with base $2.$ Notice that $4=2_{2}$ and $16=2_{4}.$
Next, we can rewrite the expression using the Power of a Power Property.
All terms in the expression now have the same base. From here, we can use the Product of Powers Property and the Quotient of Powers Property to simplify.
The answer is $2_{-32},$ which can also be written as $2_{32}1 .$

$4_{34}⋅16_{31}2_{310} $

Rewrite

Rewrite $4$ as $2_{2}$

$(2_{2})_{34}⋅16_{31}2_{310} $

Rewrite

Rewrite $16$ as $2_{4}$

$(2_{2})_{34}⋅(2_{4})_{31}2_{310} $

$(2_{2})_{34}⋅(2_{4})_{31}2_{310} $

PowPow

$(a_{m})_{n}=a_{m⋅n}$

$2_{2⋅34}⋅2_{4⋅31}2_{310} $

Multiply

Multiply

$2_{38}⋅2_{34}2_{310} $

$2_{38}⋅2_{34}2_{310} $

MultPow

$a_{m}⋅a_{n}=a_{m+n}$

$2_{38+34}2_{310} $

AddFrac

Add fractions

$2_{312}2_{310} $

DivPow

$a_{n}a_{m} =a_{m−n}$

$2_{310−312}$

SubFrac

Subtract fractions

$2_{-32}$

{{ 'mldesktop-placeholder-grade' | message }} {{ article.displayTitle }}!

{{ exercise.headTitle }}

{{ 'ml-heading-exercise' | message }} {{ focusmode.exercise.exerciseName }}