Sign In
In geometry, triangles play a pivotal role. Understanding when two triangles are congruent (meaning they have the exact same size and shape) is crucial. The key to this understanding lies in the congruence theorems. These theorems provide criteria that, when met, guarantee that two triangles are congruent. For instance, if you know certain sides or angles of one triangle match those of another, you can confidently state they are congruent. This knowledge is invaluable for architects, engineers, and anyone looking to ensure precision in their designs or constructions.
| | 16 Theory slides |
| | 10 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| | Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
Consider the following statement.
Using the following applet, investigate if that statement is true. To do so, try to map △ ABC onto △ JLK by applying different rigid motions to △ ABC.
Reflectbutton.
In the previous exploration, it was seen that a pair of triangles can have corresponding congruent angles but not be congruent triangles. Therefore, relying only on the relationship of only angles is not a valid criterion.
Angle-Angle-Angle is not a valid criterion for proving triangle congruence.
Use segments AB and AC to construct two different triangles, one at a time, in such a way that the angle formed at A has the same measure in both triangles.
The previous exploration suggests that two triangles are congruent whenever they have two pairs of corresponding congruent sides and the corresponding included angles are congruent. In fact, this conclusion is formalized in the Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem
If two sides and the included angle of a triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
AB ≅ DE ∠ A ≅ ∠ D AC ≅ DF ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
The primary purpose of the proof is finding a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways. One of the ways will be shown here.
Since the image of the translation does not match △ ABC, at least one more transformation is needed.
As before, the image does not match △ ABC. Therefore, a third rigid motion is required.
This time the image matches △ ABC.
Consequently, after a sequence of rigid motions, △ DEF can be mapped onto △ ABC. This means that △ DEF and △ ABC are congruent triangles. The proof is complete.
In the following diagram, triangles ADE and BCE are congruent, and ∠ ADC is congruent to ∠ BCD.
How many more pairs of congruent triangles are there in the diagram? Name each congruent triangle pair.
Since these triangles are congruent, their corresponding parts are congruent. This implies that AD is congruent to BC.
Because △ ADE and △ BCE are parts of △ ADC and △ BCD respectively, consider triangles ADC and BCD.
Notice that CD is a common side for triangles ADC and BCD. Because of the Reflexive Property of Congruence, CD is congruent to itself. Next, list the corresponding congruent parts between these two triangles. cl AD ≅ BC & Side ∠ADC ≅ ∠BCD & Angle DC ≅ CD & Side By the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Congruence Theorem, it can be concluded that △ ADC and △ BCD are congruent.
△ ADC ≅ △ BCD
Next, consider triangles ABD and BAC. Because △ ADE and △ BCE are congruent, ∠ ADB and ∠ BCA are congruent. Additionally, since △ ADC and △ BCD are congruent, CA is congruent to DB.
Below, the corresponding congruent parts between △ ABD and △ BAC are listed. cl AD ≅ BC &Side ∠ADB ≅ ∠BCA &Angle DB ≅ CA &Side One more time, the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Congruence Theorem can be used to conclude that triangles ABD and BAC are congruent.
△ ABD ≅ △ BAC
The last two triangles to consider are triangles ABE and DEC. Unlike the first two pairs, these dimensions seem to be quite different. Therefore, it can be concluded that they are not congruent.
Consequently, in the initial diagram, there are two more pairs of congruent triangles in addition to the given one.
Use segment AB and the rays AX and BY to construct two different triangles, one at a time, in such a way that the following conditions are met.
The following statement could be seen in the previous applet. When two triangles have two pairs of corresponding congruent angles, and the included corresponding sides are congruent, the triangles are then congruent. That leads to the second criteria for triangle congruence.
If two angles and the included side of a triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
∠ A ≅ ∠ D AB ≅ DE ∠ B ≅ ∠ E ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
The goal of the proof is to find a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways. One of the ways will be shown here.
Since the image of the translation does not match △ ABC, at least one more transformation is needed.
As before, the image does not match △ ABC. Therefore, a third rigid motion is required.
This time the image matches △ ABC.
Consequently, after a sequence of rigid motions △ DEF can be mapped onto △ ABC. This means that △ DEF and △ ABC are congruent triangles.
Consider the following diagram.
What is the value of x+y+z?
By the Reflexive Property of Congruence, QS is congruent to itself. Additionally, ∠ PQS and ∠ RSQ are congruent, as are ∠ PSQ and ∠ RQS. cl ∠ PQS ≅ ∠ RSQ & Angle QS ≅ QS & Side ∠ PSQ ≅ ∠ RQS & Angle Consequently, △ PQS and △ RSQ are congruent because of the Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) Congruence Theorem. Therefore, the corresponding sides and angles are congruent. △ PQS ≅ △ RSQ ⇒ { ∠ P &≅ ∠ R PQ &≅ RS PS &≅ RQ . By definition, congruent angles have the same measure, and congruent segments have the same length. Therefore, the congruence statements on the right-hand side support the formation of the following three equations. 8z+2=50 & (I) 6=2y+x & (II) 5x-3=4.5 & (III) By solving Equation (I), the value of z can be found.
Next, solve Equation (III) to find the value of x.
Then, the value of y can be found by substituting x=1.5 into the Equation (II) and solving the resulting equation for y.
x= 1.5
LHS-1.5=RHS-1.5
.LHS /2.=.RHS /2.
Use a calculator
Rearrange equation
Finally, the required sum can be calculated by substituting the values found for x, y, and z.
At the beginning of the lesson, it was shown that the Angle-Angle-Angle is not a valid criterion for determining triangle congruence. Next, using the following applet, it will be investigated if the Side-Side-Side is a valid criterion. Use segments AB, AC, and BC to construct two different triangles. Construct the triangles one at a time.
As seen in the previous exploration, the Side-Side-Side is a valid criterion for checking triangle congruence.
If the three sides of a triangle are congruent to the three sides of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
AB ≅ DE BC ≅ EF AC ≅ DF ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
The primary purpose of this proof is finding a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways. One of them will be shown here.
Since the image of the translation does not match △ ABC, at least one more transformation is needed.
As before, the image does not match △ ABC. Therefore, a third rigid motion is required.
It can be noted that AC = AF'' and BC = BF''. By the Converse Perpendicular Bisector Theorem, AB is a perpendicular bisector of CF''. Points along the perpendicular bisector are equidistant from the endpoints of the segment, so CG = GF''.
Finally, F'' can be mapped onto C by a reflection across AB by reflecting △ ABF'' across AB. Because reflections preserve angles, AF'' and BF'' are mapped onto AC and BC, respectively.
This time the image matches △ ABC.
Consequently, the application of a sequence of rigid motions allows △ DEF to be mapped onto △ ABC. This means that △ DEF and △ ABC are congruent triangles. The proof is complete.
Given three random segments, it is not always possible to construct a triangle. But, when possible, this triangle will be unique. This fact implies that the angle measures of that triangle are also unique.
In the following diagram, R_1 is a rectangle, S_1 and S_2 are squares, T_1, T_2, and △ MKL are isosceles triangles, DK is congruent to CL, and GM is congruent to JM.
If m∠ JCK = 3z+8, what is the value of x?
Substitute values
An expression of x was found in terms of z. Therefore, to find the value of x, the value of z should first be known.
If △ DGL and △ CJK can be proven to be congruent, that would provide the needed information to find the value of z. Therefore, focus on those two triangles.
Notice that KL is common to both triangles. By using the Segment Addition Postulate, the following pair of equations can be written. DL=DK+KL & (I) CK=CL+LK & (II) Since DK is congruent to CL, these segments have the same length, that is, DK = CL. Simlarly, KL=LK. By substituting these expressions into Equation (I), a relation between DL and CK will be obtained.
This equation implies that DL and CK are congruent.
DL ≅ CK
Once more, the Segment Addition Postulate can be used to rewrite GL and JK. GL = GM+ML & (I) JK = JM+MK & (II) Because △ MKL is isosceles, MK is congruent to ML. Therefore, ML=MK. Keep in mind that it is given that GM and JM are congruent. That means GM=JM. These two expressions can be substituted into Equation (I).
Based on the equation just obtained, it can be concluded that GL and JK are congruent.
GL ≅ JK
Since R_1 is a rectangle, S_1 and S_2 are squares, and T_1 and T_2 are isosceles triangles, the following consequences can be drawn.
| Given | Consequence |
|---|---|
| R_1 is a rectangle | DA≅CB |
| S_1 is a square | DG≅DE |
| S_2 is a square | CH≅CJ |
| T_1 is an isosceles triangle | DE≅DA |
| T_2 is an isosceles triangle | CB≅CH |
Next, organize the information in the right-hand column in a flow chart and use the Transitive Property of Congruence to prove that DG ≅ CJ.
Previously, the following three congruence statements were obtained. cl DL ≅ CK & Side GL ≅ JK & Side DG ≅ CJ & Side The Side-Side-Side (SSS) Congruence Theorem allows to conclude that △ DGL is congruent to △ CJK.
Since corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent, it can be concluded that ∠ DGL is congruent to ∠ CJK. Therefore, z=34.
Finally, to find the value of x, substitute z=34 into the equation x = 172-3z. Then solve for x.
Notice that the ASA criterion requires the congruent sides to be included between the two pairs of corresponding congruent angles. Using the following applet, investigate what happens when the congruent sides are not the included sides.
Use segment AB and the rays AX and BY to construct two different triangles, one at a time, in such a way that these conditions are met:
As seen in the previous exploration, the Angle-Angle-Side condition is a valid criterion for triangle congruence.
If two angles and a non-included side of a triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
∠A ≅ ∠D ∠B ≅ ∠E BC ≅ EF ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
The primary purpose of the proof is finding a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways. One of the ways will be shown here.
Since the image of the translation does not match △ ABC, at least one more transformation is needed.
As before, the image does not match △ ABC. Therefore, a third rigid motion is required.
Reflect △ CBD'' across BC. Because reflections preserve angles, BD'' and CD'' are mapped onto BA and CA, respectively. Then, the point of intersection of the original segments D'' is mapped onto the point of intersection of the image segments A.
This time the image matches △ ABC.
Consequently, after a sequence of rigid motions, △ DEF can be mapped onto △ ABC. This means that △ DEF and △ ABC are congruent triangles. The proof is complete.
Dylan bought a new boomerang to play with his friends next summer. In the drawing printed on the boomerang, ∠ A and ∠ C are congruent, and BF and BE are congruent.
Show that AE is congruent to CF.
Notice that ∠ B is common to both triangles. By the Reflexive Property of Congruence, ∠ B is congruent to itself. Also, it is given that ∠ A is congruent to ∠ C, and BF is congruent to BE. cl ∠ A ≅ ∠ C & Angle ∠ B ≅ ∠ B & Angle BF ≅ BE & Side Applying the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) Congruence Theorem, it is obtained that △ ABE is congruent to △ CBF. Consequently, their corresponding parts are congruent, which means that AE is congruent to CF.
With the help of the following applet, investigate if the Side-Side-Angle is a valid criterion for determining triangle congruence.
Use segments AB and AC to construct two different triangles in such a way that the angle formed at B has the same measure in both triangles.
With the previous applet, it can be checked that, in general, the Side-Side-Angle is not a valid criterion to determine triangle congruence. For instance, the following triangles meet the conditions of this criterion, and they are not congruent.
However, this criteria is valid in the particular case that both triangles are right triangles.
If the hypotenuse and one leg of a right triangle are congruent to the hypotenuse and one leg of another right triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram, the following relations hold true.
{ c m∠A = 90^(∘) m∠D = 90^(∘) AB ≅ DE BC ≅ EF . ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
By applying the Pythagorean Theorem in each triangle, the following equations can be written. c^2 = a^2 + b_1^2 & (I) c^2 = a^2 + b_2^2 & (II) The expression on the right hand-side of the first equation can be substituted into the second equation. Then a relation between b_1 and b_2 can be found.
(II): c^2= a^2+b_1^2
Since both b_1 and b_2 represent side lengths, they are positive numbers. Moreover, the absolute value of a positive number is the number itself. Therefore, the second equation implies that b_1 and b_2 are equal. |b_1| &= |b_2| b_1 &> 0 b_2 &> 0 ⇒ b_1=b_2 Consequently, the three sides of △ ABC are congruent to the corresponding three sides of △ DEF.
Therefore, by the Side-Side-Side Congruence Theorem the triangles are congruent.
△ ABC ≅ △ DEF
In the following chart, all the criteria for triangle congruence seen in the lesson are listed.
Ignacio says that △ ABD is congruent to △ CDB by the SSS Congruence Theorem. Paulina says that the triangles are congruent by the HL Congruence Theorem. Who, if either, is correct?
Let's start by explaining the theorems.
From the diagram, we can see that the triangles share their hypotenuse. Therefore, by the Reflexive Property of Congruence, we can claim that the hypotenuses are congruent. Let's add this to the diagram.
Next, by separating the two triangles, it becomes easier to see both Ignacio's and Paulina's points of view.
As we can see, congruence can be proved by both theorems. Therefore, both Ignacio and Paulina are correct.
Examining the diagram, we can identify two right triangles. Let's introduce some variables to label the unknown sides. Then we can write two equations to find the missing lengths.
Let's solve for the unknown hypotenuse c.
Let's also solve for the unknown leg b.
The unknown leg is 6 units long. Since the two triangles have three pairs of congruent corresponding sides, we know that they are congruent by the Side-Side-Side Congruence Theorem. We could also use the Hypotenuse-Leg Congruence Theorem.
From the diagram, we notice that the triangles have two pairs of congruent angles and one pair of corresponding congruent non-included sides. With this information, we can claim congruence by the Angle-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem.
Examining the diagram, we see that the triangles have a pair of congruent angles and a pair of congruent sides. Additionally, the triangles also share one of their sides. By the Reflexive Property of Congruence, we know that this side is congruent as well. Let's mark this in the diagram.
However, this information does not match any triangle congruence theorem. Therefore, we cannot prove congruence.
Just like in the previous exercise, we have two triangles that share a side. This means this side is congruent according to the Reflexive Property of Congruence. Let's add this to the diagram.
Now we can claim congruence by the Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem.
Which triangles are congruent to △ A? Select all that apply.
Looking at △ A, we see a couple of things.
Given the information about △ A, we cannot use the Side-Side-Side Congruence Theorem or the Hypotenuse-Leg Congruence Theorem. We are left with three theorems which can be used to prove triangle congruence.
In order to use SAS, two pairs of sides and their included angles must be congruent. Examining the triangles, we see that only △ D fulfills this criteria.
To use ASA or AAS, we need to know two angles and one side, either the included side (ASA) or a non-included side (AAS). Examining the diagram, we see that △ E fulfills the ASA criteria.
The triangles that are congruent to △ A are △ D and △ E.
Examining the diagram, we see three pairs of congruent sides. &AC≅DE &BC≅BE &AB≅DB Since we have three pairs of congruent sides, the triangles are congruent by the Side-Side-Side Congruence Theorem.
Notice that we have not been given any information about the triangle's angles. Therefore, we can only attempt to use the Side-Side-Side Congruence Theorem. From the diagram we can identify a pair of congruent sides. Also, the triangles share QS as a side. Therefore, according to the Reflexive Property of Congruence, this side of the triangles are congruent as well. Let us add that to the diagram.
To prove congruence by the SSS Congruence Theorem, we also need the remaining pair of sides to be congruent. Even though it appears as though PS and RS are congruent, we do not have a way to confirm that they are. Therefore, we cannot claim congruence.
If the hypotenuse and a pair of legs in two right triangles are congruent, then by the HL Congruence Theorem, the triangles are congruent. From the diagram, we can see that the hypotenuses are congruent, and we can also identify a pair of congruent legs. BC ≅ EF AB ≅ DE Since the triangles are both right triangles, we can claim congruence by the HL Congruence Theorem.
Examining the triangles, we can identify two pairs of congruent angles and one pair of non-included congruent sides. Angle:& ∠ E ≅ ∠ A Angle:& ∠ D ≅ ∠ C Side:& DF≅CB As we can see, we have enough information to claim congruence by the AAS Congruence Theorem.
Examining the diagram, we can identify a pair of congruent angles. We can also see that ∠ ACD is a straight angle, and because ∠ BCD is a right angle, ∠ BCA must be a right angle as well. Additionally, BC is a shared side, which means we can claim that this side is congruent according to the Reflexive Property of Congruence.
Let's list everything we know. Angle:& ∠ BAC≅ ∠ BDC Angle:& ∠ BCA ≅ ∠ BCD Side:& BC≅BC As we can see, we can claim congruence by the AAS Congruence Theorem.
From the diagram, we can see that the triangles have two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent non-included angles. Angle:& ∠ F ≅ ∠ C Side:& EF≅AC Side:& ED≅AB There is no congruence theorem that uses two sides and a non-included angle. Therefore, there is not enough information to claim congruence.