Sign In
| Student Learning Objectives: |
|---|
|
| | 16 Theory slides |
| | 10 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| | Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
Consider the following statement.
Using the following applet, investigate if that statement is true. To do so, try to map △ ABC onto △ JLK by applying different rigid motions to △ ABC.
Reflectbutton.
In the previous exploration, it was seen that a pair of triangles can have corresponding congruent angles but not be congruent triangles. Therefore, relying only on the relationship of only angles is not a valid criterion.
Angle-Angle-Angle is not a valid criterion for proving triangle congruence.
Use segments AB and AC to construct two different triangles, one at a time, in such a way that the angle formed at A has the same measure in both triangles.
The previous exploration suggests that two triangles are congruent whenever they have two pairs of corresponding congruent sides and the corresponding included angles are congruent. In fact, this conclusion is formalized in the Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem
If two sides and the included angle of a triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
AB ≅ DE ∠ A ≅ ∠ D AC ≅ DF ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
The primary purpose of the proof is finding a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways. One of the ways will be shown here.
Since the image of the translation does not match △ ABC, at least one more transformation is needed.
As before, the image does not match △ ABC. Therefore, a third rigid motion is required.
This time the image matches △ ABC.
Consequently, after a sequence of rigid motions, △ DEF can be mapped onto △ ABC. This means that △ DEF and △ ABC are congruent triangles. The proof is complete.
In the following diagram, triangles ADE and BCE are congruent, and ∠ ADC is congruent to ∠ BCD.
How many more pairs of congruent triangles are there in the diagram? Name each congruent triangle pair.
Since these triangles are congruent, their corresponding parts are congruent. This implies that AD is congruent to BC.
Because △ ADE and △ BCE are parts of △ ADC and △ BCD respectively, consider triangles ADC and BCD.
Notice that CD is a common side for triangles ADC and BCD. Because of the Reflexive Property of Congruence, CD is congruent to itself. Next, list the corresponding congruent parts between these two triangles. cl AD ≅ BC & Side ∠ADC ≅ ∠BCD & Angle DC ≅ CD & Side By the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Congruence Theorem, it can be concluded that △ ADC and △ BCD are congruent.
△ ADC ≅ △ BCD
Next, consider triangles ABD and BAC. Because △ ADE and △ BCE are congruent, ∠ ADB and ∠ BCA are congruent. Additionally, since △ ADC and △ BCD are congruent, CA is congruent to DB.
Below, the corresponding congruent parts between △ ABD and △ BAC are listed. cl AD ≅ BC &Side ∠ADB ≅ ∠BCA &Angle DB ≅ CA &Side One more time, the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Congruence Theorem can be used to conclude that triangles ABD and BAC are congruent.
△ ABD ≅ △ BAC
The last two triangles to consider are triangles ABE and DEC. Unlike the first two pairs, these dimensions seem to be quite different. Therefore, it can be concluded that they are not congruent.
Consequently, in the initial diagram, there are two more pairs of congruent triangles in addition to the given one.
Use segment AB and the rays AX and BY to construct two different triangles, one at a time, in such a way that the following conditions are met.
The following statement could be seen in the previous applet. When two triangles have two pairs of corresponding congruent angles, and the included corresponding sides are congruent, the triangles are then congruent. That leads to the second criteria for triangle congruence.
If two angles and the included side of a triangle are congruent to two angles and the included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
∠ A ≅ ∠ D AB ≅ DE ∠ B ≅ ∠ E ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
The goal of the proof is to find a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways. One of the ways will be shown here.
Since the image of the translation does not match △ ABC, at least one more transformation is needed.
As before, the image does not match △ ABC. Therefore, a third rigid motion is required.
This time the image matches △ ABC.
Consequently, after a sequence of rigid motions △ DEF can be mapped onto △ ABC. This means that △ DEF and △ ABC are congruent triangles.
Consider the following diagram.
What is the value of x+y+z?
By the Reflexive Property of Congruence, QS is congruent to itself. Additionally, ∠ PQS and ∠ RSQ are congruent, as are ∠ PSQ and ∠ RQS. cl ∠ PQS ≅ ∠ RSQ & Angle QS ≅ QS & Side ∠ PSQ ≅ ∠ RQS & Angle Consequently, △ PQS and △ RSQ are congruent because of the Angle-Side-Angle (ASA) Congruence Theorem. Therefore, the corresponding sides and angles are congruent. △ PQS ≅ △ RSQ ⇒ { ∠ P &≅ ∠ R PQ &≅ RS PS &≅ RQ . By definition, congruent angles have the same measure, and congruent segments have the same length. Therefore, the congruence statements on the right-hand side support the formation of the following three equations. 8z+2=50 & (I) 6=2y+x & (II) 5x-3=4.5 & (III) By solving Equation (I), the value of z can be found.
Next, solve Equation (III) to find the value of x.
Then, the value of y can be found by substituting x=1.5 into the Equation (II) and solving the resulting equation for y.
x= 1.5
LHS-1.5=RHS-1.5
.LHS /2.=.RHS /2.
Use a calculator
Rearrange equation
Finally, the required sum can be calculated by substituting the values found for x, y, and z.
At the beginning of the lesson, it was shown that the Angle-Angle-Angle is not a valid criterion for determining triangle congruence. Next, using the following applet, it will be investigated if the Side-Side-Side is a valid criterion. Use segments AB, AC, and BC to construct two different triangles. Construct the triangles one at a time.
As seen in the previous exploration, the Side-Side-Side is a valid criterion for checking triangle congruence.
If the three sides of a triangle are congruent to the three sides of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
AB ≅ DE BC ≅ EF AC ≅ DF ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
The primary purpose of this proof is finding a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways. One of them will be shown here.
Since the image of the translation does not match △ ABC, at least one more transformation is needed.
As before, the image does not match △ ABC. Therefore, a third rigid motion is required.
It can be noted that AC = AF'' and BC = BF''. By the Converse Perpendicular Bisector Theorem, AB is a perpendicular bisector of CF''. Points along the perpendicular bisector are equidistant from the endpoints of the segment, so CG = GF''.
Finally, F'' can be mapped onto C by a reflection across AB by reflecting △ ABF'' across AB. Because reflections preserve angles, AF'' and BF'' are mapped onto AC and BC, respectively.
This time the image matches △ ABC.
Consequently, the application of a sequence of rigid motions allows △ DEF to be mapped onto △ ABC. This means that △ DEF and △ ABC are congruent triangles. The proof is complete.
Given three random segments, it is not always possible to construct a triangle. But, when possible, this triangle will be unique. This fact implies that the angle measures of that triangle are also unique.
In the following diagram, R_1 is a rectangle, S_1 and S_2 are squares, T_1, T_2, and △ MKL are isosceles triangles, DK is congruent to CL, and GM is congruent to JM.
If m∠ JCK = 3z+8, what is the value of x?
Substitute values
An expression of x was found in terms of z. Therefore, to find the value of x, the value of z should first be known.
If △ DGL and △ CJK can be proven to be congruent, that would provide the needed information to find the value of z. Therefore, focus on those two triangles.
Notice that KL is common to both triangles. By using the Segment Addition Postulate, the following pair of equations can be written. DL=DK+KL & (I) CK=CL+LK & (II) Since DK is congruent to CL, these segments have the same length, that is, DK = CL. Simlarly, KL=LK. By substituting these expressions into Equation (I), a relation between DL and CK will be obtained.
This equation implies that DL and CK are congruent.
DL ≅ CK
Once more, the Segment Addition Postulate can be used to rewrite GL and JK. GL = GM+ML & (I) JK = JM+MK & (II) Because △ MKL is isosceles, MK is congruent to ML. Therefore, ML=MK. Keep in mind that it is given that GM and JM are congruent. That means GM=JM. These two expressions can be substituted into Equation (I).
Based on the equation just obtained, it can be concluded that GL and JK are congruent.
GL ≅ JK
Since R_1 is a rectangle, S_1 and S_2 are squares, and T_1 and T_2 are isosceles triangles, the following consequences can be drawn.
| Given | Consequence |
|---|---|
| R_1 is a rectangle | DA≅CB |
| S_1 is a square | DG≅DE |
| S_2 is a square | CH≅CJ |
| T_1 is an isosceles triangle | DE≅DA |
| T_2 is an isosceles triangle | CB≅CH |
Next, organize the information in the right-hand column in a flow chart and use the Transitive Property of Congruence to prove that DG ≅ CJ.
Previously, the following three congruence statements were obtained. cl DL ≅ CK & Side GL ≅ JK & Side DG ≅ CJ & Side The Side-Side-Side (SSS) Congruence Theorem allows to conclude that △ DGL is congruent to △ CJK.
Since corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent, it can be concluded that ∠ DGL is congruent to ∠ CJK. Therefore, z=34.
Finally, to find the value of x, substitute z=34 into the equation x = 172-3z. Then solve for x.
Notice that the ASA criterion requires the congruent sides to be included between the two pairs of corresponding congruent angles. Using the following applet, investigate what happens when the congruent sides are not the included sides.
Use segment AB and the rays AX and BY to construct two different triangles, one at a time, in such a way that these conditions are met:
As seen in the previous exploration, the Angle-Angle-Side condition is a valid criterion for triangle congruence.
If two angles and a non-included side of a triangle are congruent to two angles and the corresponding non-included side of another triangle, then the triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram above, the theorem can be written as follows.
∠A ≅ ∠D ∠B ≅ ∠E BC ≅ EF ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
The primary purpose of the proof is finding a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways. One of the ways will be shown here.
Since the image of the translation does not match △ ABC, at least one more transformation is needed.
As before, the image does not match △ ABC. Therefore, a third rigid motion is required.
Reflect △ CBD'' across BC. Because reflections preserve angles, BD'' and CD'' are mapped onto BA and CA, respectively. Then, the point of intersection of the original segments D'' is mapped onto the point of intersection of the image segments A.
This time the image matches △ ABC.
Consequently, after a sequence of rigid motions, △ DEF can be mapped onto △ ABC. This means that △ DEF and △ ABC are congruent triangles. The proof is complete.
Dylan bought a new boomerang to play with his friends next summer. In the drawing printed on the boomerang, ∠ A and ∠ C are congruent, and BF and BE are congruent.
Show that AE is congruent to CF.
Notice that ∠ B is common to both triangles. By the Reflexive Property of Congruence, ∠ B is congruent to itself. Also, it is given that ∠ A is congruent to ∠ C, and BF is congruent to BE. cl ∠ A ≅ ∠ C & Angle ∠ B ≅ ∠ B & Angle BF ≅ BE & Side Applying the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) Congruence Theorem, it is obtained that △ ABE is congruent to △ CBF. Consequently, their corresponding parts are congruent, which means that AE is congruent to CF.
With the help of the following applet, investigate if the Side-Side-Angle is a valid criterion for determining triangle congruence.
Use segments AB and AC to construct two different triangles in such a way that the angle formed at B has the same measure in both triangles.
With the previous applet, it can be checked that, in general, the Side-Side-Angle is not a valid criterion to determine triangle congruence. For instance, the following triangles meet the conditions of this criterion, and they are not congruent.
However, this criteria is valid in the particular case that both triangles are right triangles.
If the hypotenuse and one leg of a right triangle are congruent to the hypotenuse and one leg of another right triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
Based on the diagram, the following relations hold true.
{ c m∠A = 90^(∘) m∠D = 90^(∘) AB ≅ DE BC ≅ EF . ⇒ △ ABC ≅ △ DEF
By applying the Pythagorean Theorem in each triangle, the following equations can be written. c^2 = a^2 + b_1^2 & (I) c^2 = a^2 + b_2^2 & (II) The expression on the right hand-side of the first equation can be substituted into the second equation. Then a relation between b_1 and b_2 can be found.
(II): c^2= a^2+b_1^2
Since both b_1 and b_2 represent side lengths, they are positive numbers. Moreover, the absolute value of a positive number is the number itself. Therefore, the second equation implies that b_1 and b_2 are equal. |b_1| &= |b_2| b_1 &> 0 b_2 &> 0 ⇒ b_1=b_2 Consequently, the three sides of △ ABC are congruent to the corresponding three sides of △ DEF.
Therefore, by the Side-Side-Side Congruence Theorem the triangles are congruent.
△ ABC ≅ △ DEF
In the following chart, all the criteria for triangle congruence seen in the lesson are listed.
Consider the following diagram.
Which of the following congruence statements are true? A& BE ≅ EA B& △ ABC ≅ △ DAF C& △ BAC ≅ △ ADE D& △ ACB ≅ △ AED
Let's go through the statements one at a time.
From the given information, we only know that BC is congruent to EA. We have no information about BE, which means that we cannot determine if statement A is true or false.
Let's only consider △ ABC and △ DAF in the diagram
There is no information about the angles or sides of △ DAF. This means we cannot state that △ ABC and △ DAF are congruent. Therefore, we cannot determine if this statement is true.
To evaluate statement C, we will separate the triangles in the statement.
We see that two angles and their included side are congruent. Therefore, we can claim congruence by the ASA Congruence Theorem. Before we can say that the statement is true, we must also make sure that it is written in the correct way. Let's identify corresponding vertices. A &→ D B &→ A C &→ E Since the statement is △ B A C ≅ △ A D E, we can confirm that the statement is true.
As we already explained, the stated triangles are congruent. In this statement, however, the vertices are named in an incorrect order. The corresponding parts do not appear in the same order, which means statement D is not true.
Consider the following diagram.
What piece(s) of information would you need to show that △ ABC is congruent to △ DBE by the ASA Congruence Theorem? A& DC ≅ DE B& DE ≅ EA C& ∠ C ≅ ∠ E D& ∠ BDE ≅ ∠ BAC
Let's start by separating the triangles. Notice that the triangles share an angle at B. Therefore, by the Reflexive Property of Congruence, we know that ∠ B is congruent to ∠ B.
To prove triangle congruence using the ASA Congruence Theorem, we need to know that two pairs of congruent angles and the corresponding included sides are congruent. From the diagram, we have a pair of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles. A ∠ B&≅ ∠ B S AB&≅ DB To use the ASA Congruence Theorem, we must also have the second pair of angles that would make AB and BD the included sides.
Therefore, the statement ∠ BDE ≅ ∠ BAC must be true to use the theorem. A& ∠ B≅ ∠ B S& AB≅ DB A& ∠ BDE≅ ∠ BAC This corresponds to option D.
What value of x makes the triangles congruent?
Examining the diagram, we can see that the two triangles share a side. We know by the Reflexive Property of Congruence that this side is congruent in our triangles.
Notice that it is not clear which of the remaining sides are corresponding. We have two cases.
Let's write the related equations for each of these cases. &Case1 & 5x= 4x+3 & 5x-2= 3x+10 [1em] &Case2 & 5x= 3x+10 & 5x-2= 4x+3 [1em] When we solve these equations, they should give the same solution in order for the triangles to be congruent. Otherwise, the triangles will not be congruent.
Let's solve the first equation.
Let's solve the second equation next.
Since the sides are congruent for different values of x, we know that the first case is impossible.
We will repeat the procedure for the second case.
Let's solve the second equation as well.
As we can see, each pair of congruent sides will have the same measure when x=5. This means that if x=5, the triangles are congruent.
Heichi claims that △ ABD can be proven congruent to △ CDB using the HL Congruence Theorem.
Is Heichi correct?
According to the HL Congruence Theorem, two right triangles are congruent when their hypotenuses and a pair of legs are congruent. From the diagram, we can see that BD is a shared hypotenuse. Therefore, by the Reflexive Property of Congruence, we know that this side is congruent.
However, we also need a pair of congruent legs. Since BC∥ AD and ∠ A and ∠ C are right angles, we know that ABCD is a rectangle. In a rectangle, opposite sides are congruent.
This gives us enough information to use the HL Congruence Theorem to prove that △ ABD is congruent to △ CDB.