Sign In
| 11 Theory slides |
| 8 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
Here are a few recommended readings before getting started with this lesson.
Heichi and Dominika like to play basketball. About two months ago, they decided to keep track of how many games they each win. Until now, Dominika has won 24 out of the 40 games against Heichi.
Rational Equation | Method |
---|---|
2x+7x=x−12 | Cross Products Property |
x−5x+x+5x=x2−252 | LCD |
Distribute -1
LHS+x2=RHS+x2
LHS+12=RHS+12
LHS/7=RHS/7
Rearrange equation
x=2
Calculate power
Add and subtract terms
Calculate quotient
In her chemistry lab, Dominika adds some 60% acid solution to 15 milliliters of a solution with 15% acid.
The percentage of acid in the final solution must equal the total amount of acid divided by the total amount of solution.
Let x be the amount of 60% acid solution to be added to 15 milliliters of a 15% acid solution. The amount of each solution in terms of x can be organized in a table.
Original | Added | New | |
---|---|---|---|
Amount of Acid | 0.15(15) | 0.6(x) | 0.15(15)+0.6(x) |
Total Solution | 15 | x | 15+x |
Multiply
Cross multiply
Rational Expression | LCD |
---|---|
x+25 | (x+2)(x+5) |
x+54 | |
(x+2)(x+5)16 |
LHS⋅(x+2)(x+5)=RHS⋅(x+2)(x+5)
Distribute (x+2)(x+5)
Cancel out common factors
Simplify quotient
x=-1
Calculate power
a(-b)=-a⋅b
Add and subtract terms
Calculate quotient
Dominika and Heichi are taking a canoe trip. They are going up the river for 1 kilometer and then returning to their starting point. The river current flows at 3 kilometers per hour. The total trip time will be 1 hour and 30 minutes.
Let x represent the speed, in kilometers per hour, that the canoe would travel with no current. Write two rational expressions for the time it takes to go and return in terms of x.
Going | Returning | |
---|---|---|
Distance (km) | 1 | 1 |
Speed (km/h) | x+3 | x−3 |
Time (h) | x+31 | x−31 |
LHS⋅(x+3)(x−3)=RHS⋅(x+3)(x−3)
Distribute (x+3)(x−3)
Cancel out common factors
Simplify quotient
Add terms
LHS−2x=RHS−2x
Rearrange equation
LHS⋅2=RHS⋅2
Use the Quadratic Formula: a=3,b=-4,c=-27
-(-a)=a
Calculate power and product
Add terms
Split into factors
a⋅b=a⋅b
Calculate root
Factor out 2
Simplify quotient
x=32±85 | |
---|---|
x1=32+85 | x2=32−85 |
x1=32+385 | x2=32−385 |
x1≈3.74 | x2≈-2.41 |
x=3.74
Add terms
Subtract term
ba=b⋅0.74a⋅0.74
ba=b⋅6.74a⋅6.74
Add fractions
Calculate quotient
Round to nearest integer
If I clear the denominators I find that the only solution is x=1, but when I substitute x=1 into the equation, it does not make any sense. |
Yes, see solution.
Solve the given rational equation. Is the solution in the domain of the rational expressions on both sides?
LHS⋅(x−1)(x+1)=RHS⋅(x−1)(x+1)
Distribute (x−1)(x+1)
a⋅b1=ba
a2−b2=(a+b)(a−b)
Cancel out common factors
Simplify quotient
Distribute -1
LHS+1=RHS+1
LHS+x=RHS+x
LHS/2=RHS/2
Rearrange equation
An alternative explanation for why x=1 are extraneous solutions can be explained as follows. In the example, both sides of the equation are multiplied by x2−1 to create an equivalent equation.
Dominika and Heichi want to paint their canoe before their next trip up the river.
ba=b⋅3a⋅3
Add fractions
Multiply
LHS⋅3t=RHS⋅3t
LHS/3=RHS/3
Rearrange equation
t=4
Multiply
ba=b⋅3a⋅3
Add fractions
Multiply
Calculate quotient
Distribute 4
LHS⋅t(t−6)=RHS⋅t(t−6)
Distribute t(t−6)
Cancel out common factors
Simplify quotient
Distribute 4
Add terms
Distribute t
LHS+24=RHS+24
LHS−8t=RHS−8t
Rearrange equation
Use the Quadratic Formula: a=1,b=-14,c=24
-(-a)=a
Calculate power and product
Subtract term
Calculate root
t=214±10 | |
---|---|
t=214+10 | t=214−10 |
t=12 | t=2 |
t=12
Subtract term
ba=b⋅2a⋅2
Add fractions
Multiply
Calculate quotient
Denominator | Factored Form | Excluded Values |
---|---|---|
x+1 | − | x=-1 |
x2−4x−5 | (x+1)(x−5) | x=-1 and x=5 |
x−5 | − | x=5 |
The excluded values for this inequality are -1 and 5.
LHS⋅(x+1)(x−5)=RHS⋅(x+1)(x−5)
Distribute (x+1)(x−5)
x2−4x−5=(x+1)(x−5)
Cancel out common factors
Simplify terms
Next, the number line will be divided into intervals. The intervals are determined by the excluded values x=-1 and x=5, and the solution to the related equation x=2.
x=-2
Calculate power
-a(-b)=a⋅b
Add and subtract terms
ba=b⋅7a⋅7
Put minus sign in numerator
Add fractions
x<-1 | -1<x<2 | 2<x<5 | x>5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Test Value | -2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
Statement | -729≱73 | 519≥53 | 21≱23 | 711≥3 |
LHS⋅x=RHS⋅x
LHS−5x=RHS−5x
LHS/25=RHS/25
Rearrange equation
Next, the number line will be divided into intervals using the excluded value x=0 and the solution to the related equation x=80.
x=-1
a(-b)=-a⋅b
Add terms
Put minus sign in front of fraction
1a=a
x<0 | 0<x<80 | x>80 | |
---|---|---|---|
Choose a Test Value | -1 | 1 | 100 |
Statement | -1995<30 | 2005<30 | 25<30 |
When solving rational equations, the goal is to eliminate the rational denominators. However, the mechanics of solving rational inequalities are quite different. With all the methods discussed in this lesson, the challenge presented at the beginning can be reconsidered now. Dominika and Heichi keep track of how many games each of them win.
Given that Dominika has won 24 out of the 40 games against Heichi, the following situation will be analyzed.
Dominika | |
---|---|
Win | Loss |
24 | 16 |
LHS⋅160+x=RHS⋅160+x
Distribute 0.50
LHS−80=RHS−80
LHS/0.5=RHS/0.5
Rearrange equation
Finally, a value from each interval is chosen and tested. If substituting this point into the inequality produces a true statement, then the numbers in this interval are solutions. If not, these numbers are not solutions.
Solve each equation by cross multiplying for the given variable. Write the answer in the simplest form.
We will solve the rational equation by cross multiplying. If a numerator or denominator contains more than one term, make sure to treat them as a parenthetical factor in the cross multiplication process.
For rational equations, extraneous solutions are values that make any denominator in the original equation 0. When we have 0 in the denominator we have an undefined expression. We have to disregard the solutions that would cause any undefined expressions. Let's check if substituting x=- 6 into the original equation causes any problem.
Since we obtained a true statement, x=- 6 is a solution of the equation.
We will solve the rational equation by using the Cross Products Property..
We have obtained a quadratic equation in the standard form. Let's identify the values of a, b, and c. p^2+11p+28=0 ⇕ 1p^2+ 11p+ 28=0 We can see that a= 1, b= 11, and c= 28. Next, we will substitute these values into the Quadratic Formula.
We will find the values for p by using the positive and negative signs. p_1=-11 + 3/2 &⇒ p_1=- 4 [1em] p_2=-11 - 3/2 &⇒ p_2=- 7 We found that p_1=- 4 and p_2=- 7 are possible solutions. Now, we have to check them to see whether any of them are extraneous. To do so, we will substitute p_1=- 4 and p_2=- 7 into the given rational equation. Let's start with p_1=- 4.
Since we obtained a true statement, p_1=- 4 is a solution to the equation. Let's now substitute p_2=- 7 into the equation.
Since we obtained a true statement, p_2=- 7 is also a solution to the equation.
We want to solve the given equation for the variable V.
P/n-RT/V=0
Recall that we can solve a rational equation by cross multiplying if it is expressed as a proportion. Therefore, we should first write the given equation as a proportion by adding RTV to both sides.
We can now apply the Cross Product Property and solve the equation for V.
Solve each equation by using the least common denominators (LCD) of the rational expressions.
We will begin by looking at the given rational equation. 3x-7/x+2-5/x=3 To solve this equation, we will first determine the least common denominator (LCD) of the rational expressions in the equation. In this case, the denominators are already factored. Let's highlight the denominators. We can rewrite 3 as 31. 3x-7/x+2-5/x= 3/1 The least common denominator is the product of these highlighted terms, x+2, x, and 1. Therefore, the least common denominator is (x+2) x. We will now multiply both sides of the equation by this common denominator and solve for x.
We will now check whether x=- 59 causes any undefined expressions in the original equation. If so, it is an extraneous solution. Let's substitute - 59 for x in the original equation.
Substituting - 59 into the original equation resulted in a true statement. Therefore, it is a solution to the equation.
We will solve the given rational equation by using the LCD.
4/x^2-2x-3=8/x-3+x/x+1
Let's start by factoring the denominators to find the least common denominator (LCD). Since the denominators on the right-hand side are already factored, we need to factor only the one on the left-hand side.
We can now rewrite the given expression. 4/x^2-2x-3=8/x-3+x/x+1 ⇕ 4/(x-3) (x+1)=8/x-3+x/x+1 In this case, the LCD is the product of (x-3) and (x+1). We will solve the equation by multiplying each side by the LCD to simplify the denominators.
Note that we have obtained a quadratic equation in standard form. Let's identify the values of a, b, and c. x^2+5x+4=0 ⇕ 1x^2+ 5x+ 4=0 We have that a= 1, b= 5, and c= 4. Let's substitute these values into the Quadratic Formula and solve for x.
We found that x_1= - 5 - 32 and x_2= - 5 + 32 are possible solutions to the given equation. x_1=- 5 - 3/2 &⇒ x_1=- 4 [0.75em] x_2=- 5 + 3/2 &⇒ x_2=- 1 Finally, we will check whether either x=- 4 or x=- 1 is an extraneous solution. To do so, we will substitute - 4 and - 1 for x in the original equation. Let's start with x= -4.
Since we obtained a true statement, x_1=- 4 is a solution of the equation. Let's now check our second solution, x_2= - 1.
Since the denominator cannot be 0, x_2=- 1 is an extraneous solution. Therefore, x=- 4 is the only solution to x
Solve each of the following inequalities and express the answer as an inequality.
To solve the rational inequality, we will follow these four steps.
Let's apply these steps to the given rational inequality one at a time.
Consider the given inequality. 1/4k + 2/3k < 1/7 Let's find the values of k for which any of the denominators is 0. c|c 4k=0 & 3k=0 ⇕ & ⇕ k=0 & k=0 The excluded value for this inequality is 0.
We obtain the related equation by replacing the inequality sign with an equals sign. c|c Inequality & Equation [0.8em] 1/4k + 2/3k < 1/7 & 1/4k + 2/3k = 1/7 Let's solve the equation. To do so, we will start by finding the least common denominator (LCD). 1/4k + 2/3k = 1/7 [0.4em] ⇕ [0.4em] 1/4 k + 2/3 k = 1/7 The least common denominator is the product of 4, k, 3, and 7. Least Common Denominator 4( k)( 3)( 7) ⇔ 84k To clear the denominators, we will solve the equation by multiplying each side by the least common denominator.
We will divide the number line considering the excluded value k=0 and the solution to the related equation k= 7712.
After dividing the number line, we get three possible intervals.
We will now test a value from each interval. Let's start with the interval k < 0. Any value from this interval can be chosen. Try testing the value k=- 1. If this substitution produces a true statement, the values in this interval are solutions to the rational inequality. If not, this interval is not included in the solution set of the inequality.
Since we obtained a true statement, we can conclude that the numbers less than 0 are in the solution set of the inequality. By following the same reasoning, we can determine whether the remaining intervals are also solutions to the given inequality.
Interval | Test Value | Statement |
---|---|---|
k< 0 | k=- 1 | - 77 < 12 ✓ |
0< k < 77/12 | k=1 | 77 ≮ 12 * |
k> 77/12 | k=7 | 11 < 12 ✓ |
We found that the solutions to the given inequality are all the numbers less than 0 or greater than 7712. Solution Set [0.6em] k<0 or k>77/12
To solve the given rational inequality, we will follow the same steps as we did in the previous part.
Consider the given inequality. 3x/x+3 + 1/x-3 > 2 Let's find the values of x for which any of the denominators is 0. c|c x+3=0 & x-3=0 ⇕ & ⇕ x=- 3 & x=3 The excluded values for this inequality are - 3 and 3.
We obtain the related equation by replacing the inequality sign with an equals sign. c|c Inequality & Equation [0.8em] 3x/x+3 + 1/x-3 > 2 & 3x/x+3 + 1/x-3 = 2 Let's solve the equation. First, we will get rid of all of the denominators by using a combination of methods.
We obtained a quadratic equation in standard form. Let's identify the values of a, b, and c. x^2-8x+21=0 ⇕ 1x^2+( - 8)x+( 21)=0 We have that a= 1, b= - 8, and c= 21. We will solve this equation by substituting these values into the Quadratic Formula.
Since the radicand is a negative number, the equation does not have real solutions.
Since the related equation does not have real solutions, we will divide the number line considering only the excluded values x=- 3 and x=3.
In this case, we get three possible intervals.
We will now test a value from each interval. Let's start with the interval x < - 3. We will test the point x=- 4. If substituting this point into the original inequality produces a true statement, then the numbers in this interval are solutions. If not, these numbers are not solutions.
Since we have obtained a true statement, we can conclude that the numbers less than - 3 are solutions to the inequality. Using the same process, we can determine whether the numbers that belong to the other intervals are solutions.
Interval | Test Value | Statement |
---|---|---|
x< - 3 | x=- 4 | 11.86... > 2 ✓ |
- 3< x < 3 | x=0 | - 0.33... > 2 * |
x>3 | x=4 | 2.71... > 2 ✓ |
We found that the solutions to the given inequality are all the numbers less than - 3 or greater than 3. Solution Set x<- 3 or x>3
Below are the steps a student takes when solving for the solutions of the following rational equation.
We will examine each step performed to identify which one has the mistake.
When solving a rational equation, we begin by multiplying each term of the equation by an algebraic expression that clears the denominators. Note that in Step I, the student multiplied the terms 2x-1x+1 and x+1x-1 by (x-1)(x+1). However, the student forgot to multiply the term - 1 by this expression.
However, we can notice that the student forgot to multiply the term - 1 by this expression. Let's multiplied every term of the equation by the term (x-1)(x+1).
This means that the mistake is that each term should be multiplied by the same expression in Step I, which is given in option A.
We will solve the equation by multiplying each term in the equation by (x-1)(x+1). Next, we will simplify the equation by using the Properties of Equality and solve it for x.
Therefore, the solution to the equation is x= 15.
Let's substitute 15, or 0.2, for x in the original equation to check if it is an extraneous solution.
Since we obtained a true statement, x = 15 is a solution.