McGraw Hill Integrated II, 2012
MH
McGraw Hill Integrated II, 2012 View details
3. Proving Triangles Congruent-SSS, SAS
Continue to next subchapter

Exercise 23 Page 359

Practice makes perfect
a Let's use the labeling suggested in the question to redraw the diamond.

Gathering Information

Since the sides of the diamond have the same length, these are congruent. ST≅TR≅RF≅FS There are also some perpendicular corners marked on the diagram. Since all right angles are congruent, these angles are also congruent. ∠ T≅∠ S≅∠ F

Let's use the labels to state the distances the question is asking about.

Description Expression
Distance from first base to third base. FT
Distance from home plate to second base. RS

Formal Statement

We are now ready to use the labels to state the given information and the claim we are asked to prove. Given: &ST≅TR≅RF≅FS & ∠ T≅∠ S≅∠ F Prove: &FT=RS

Explanation

Let's draw two copies of the diamond with the one-one diagonal added. Instead of the length of the sides, let's use markers to indicate congruence. On both copies we will focus on half of the diamond.

We can see congruent sides and angles in the two triangles. TS&≅ SF SF&≅ FR ∠ S&≅ ∠ F Since two pairs of sides and the included angles are congruent, the Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Congruence Postulate guarantees that the triangles are congruent. △ TSF≅ △ SFR Since corresponding segments of congruent triangles are congruent, this means that the diagonals of the diamond are congruent. FT≅ RS Using the definition of congruent segments, this means that the diagonals have the same length. FT= RS Thus, we proved that the distance from first base to third base is the same as the distance from home plate to second base.

Two-column Proof

Given: &ST≅TR≅RF≅FS & ∠ T≅∠ S≅∠ F Prove: &FT=RS Proof:

Statements
Reasons
1.
ST≅TR≅RF≅FS
∠ T≅∠ S≅∠ F
1.
Given
2.
△ TSF≅△ SFR
2.
Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Congruence Postulate
3.
FT≅RS
3.
Corresponding sides of congruent triangles are congruent
4.
FT=RS
4.
Definition of congruent segments
b We can use the labeling in Part A to express the angles in the question.
Description Expression
Angle formed between second base, home plate, and third base. ∠ SRT
Angle formed between second base, home plate, and first base. ∠ SRF

Formal Statement

Like in Part A, we can formally state the claim. Note that we are still working with the same given congruences. Given: &ST≅TR≅RF≅FS & ∠ T≅∠ S≅∠ F Prove: &∠ SRT≅∠ SRF

Explanation

Let's include the diagonal SR on the diagram and mark the angles we are interested in.

Triangles △ SRT and △ SRF have two pairs of congruent sides and congruent included angles, so like in Part A they are congruent. △ SRT≅ △ SRF Since corresponding angles of congruent triangles are congruent, this means that the angles the question asks about are congruent. ∠ SRT≅ ∠ SRF Thus, we proved that the angle formed between second base, home plate, and third base is congruent to the angle formed between second base, home plate, and first base.

Two-column Proof

Given: &ST≅TR≅RF≅FS & ∠ T≅∠ S≅∠ F Prove: &∠ SRT≅∠ SRF Proof:

Statements
Reasons
1.
ST≅TR≅RF≅FS
∠ T≅∠ S≅∠ F
1.
Given
2.
△ SRT≅△ SRF
2.
Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Congruence Postulate
3.
∠ SRT≅∠ SRF
3.
Corresponding angles of congruent triangles are congruent