| {{ 'ml-lesson-number-slides' | message : article.intro.bblockCount }} |
| {{ 'ml-lesson-number-exercises' | message : article.intro.exerciseCount }} |
| {{ 'ml-lesson-time-estimation' | message }} |
Here are a few recommended readings before getting started with this lesson.
By applying rigid motions, investigate whether the given pair of triangles are congruent or not.
Congruent or Similar? | Relationship |
---|---|
Congruent | The corresponding sides and angles of the figures are congruent. |
Similar | The corresponding sides of the figures are proportional.
The corresponding angles of the figures are also congruent. |
When two triangles are congruent, it seems natural to think that the corresponding parts are congruent as well. What about the same concept when the statement is reversed? That is to say, if the corresponding parts of two triangles are congruent, are the triangles congruent? The following claim answers this question.
Two triangles are congruent if and only if their corresponding sides and angles are congruent.
Using the triangles shown, this claim can be written algebraically as follows.
This proof will be developed based on the given diagram, but it is valid for any pair of triangles. The proof of this biconditional statement consists of two parts, one for each direction.
To begin, mark the congruent parts on the given diagram.
The primary purpose is finding a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways, here it is shown one of them.
Consequently, through applying different rigid motions, △ABC was mapped onto △DEF. This implies that △ABC and △DEF are congruent. Then, the proof is complete.
Use the measuring tool to find the side lengths and angle measures of each triangle. Then, compare them. Are all corresponding parts congruent? If the triangles are congruent, they have equal perimeters.
As seen, both triangles have the same side lengths and angle measures. That is, all their corresponding sides and angles are congruent. Therefore, the two triangles are congruent. Jordan was correct!
The new logo is made of two congruent triangles.
To show that two triangles are not congruent, it is enough to find only one side or angle of one of the triangles that is not congruent to any side or angle of the second triangle.
Mark, Magdalena, and Kevin each bought a notebook with a triangle design on the cover.
Are there any pairs of congruent triangles? If so, which ones are congruent?
No, there are no pairs of congruent triangles.
To conclude that two triangles are congruent, check that all corresponding sides and angles are congruent.
Beginning with Mark's notebook, notice that the triangle has a 50∘ angle, while neither of the other two triangles have a 50∘ angle. That is, there is a part in Mark's triangle that is not congruent to any part of the other two triangles.
The triangle in Mark's notebook is not congruent to any of the other triangles.
Now, moving on to Madaelena's notebeook. Notice that the triangle has the same angle measures as the triangle in Kevin's notebook.
Before concluding that these two triangles are congruent, remember, all the corresponding parts have to be congruent. Therefore, the sides opposite to the 80∘ angle of each triangle should be congruent. Well, that is not the case.
It was a close call, but the triangle in Magdalena's notebook is not congruent to the triangle in Kevin's notebook. As a result, none of the triangles are congruent to the others.
The following figure is made of 5 triangles.
How many pairs of congruent triangles are there?Notice that BF is a common side for △ABF and △DFB. Remember, if two sides or angles have the same number of marks, they are congruent.
To determine which pairs of triangles are congruent, pick one of them and compare its parts to the parts of the rest of the triangles. Start by comparing △AFG to △ABF. These two triangles have AF as a common side.
By applying the concept of reading the marks to check for congruency, it can be said that BF is not congruent to any side of △AFG. Consequently, △AFG is not congruent to △ABF. By the same reasoning, △AFG is not congruent to △BFD either.As with polygons, when it comes to writing a triangle congruence statement, the order in which the vertices are written is critical. Naming them in an incorrect order leads to erroneous conclusions. Consider, for example, the following congruent triangles.
Although the triangles are congruent, the congruence statement △ABC≅△MQT is incorrect. Why? Because it would lead to the following conclusions about the sides and angles.
Two polygons are congruent if and only if their corresponding sides and angles are congruent. |