Sign In
| 9 Theory slides |
| 9 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
Here are a few recommended readings before getting started with this lesson.
By applying rigid motions, investigate whether the given pair of triangles are congruent or not.
Congruent or Similar? | Relationship |
---|---|
Congruent | The corresponding sides and angles of the figures are congruent. |
Similar | The corresponding sides of the figures are proportional.
The corresponding angles of the figures are also congruent. |
When two triangles are congruent, it seems natural to think that the corresponding parts are congruent as well. What about the same concept when the statement is reversed? That is to say, if the corresponding parts of two triangles are congruent, are the triangles congruent? The following claim answers this question.
Two triangles are congruent if and only if their corresponding sides and angles are congruent.
Using the triangles shown, this claim can be written algebraically as follows.
This proof will be developed based on the given diagram, but it is valid for any pair of triangles. The proof of this biconditional statement consists of two parts, one for each direction.
To begin, mark the congruent parts on the given diagram.
The primary purpose is finding a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one triangle onto the other. This can be done in several ways, here it is shown one of them.
Consequently, through applying different rigid motions, △ABC was mapped onto △DEF. This implies that △ABC and △DEF are congruent. Then, the proof is complete.
Use the measuring tool to find the side lengths and angle measures of each triangle. Then, compare them. Are all corresponding parts congruent? If the triangles are congruent, they have equal perimeters.
As seen, both triangles have the same side lengths and angle measures. That is, all their corresponding sides and angles are congruent. Therefore, the two triangles are congruent. Jordan was correct!
The new logo is made of two congruent triangles.
To show that two triangles are not congruent, it is enough to find only one side or angle of one of the triangles that is not congruent to any side or angle of the second triangle.
Mark, Magdalena, and Kevin each bought a notebook with a triangle design on the cover.
Are there any pairs of congruent triangles? If so, which ones are congruent?
No, there are no pairs of congruent triangles.
To conclude that two triangles are congruent, check that all corresponding sides and angles are congruent.
Beginning with Mark's notebook, notice that the triangle has a 50∘ angle, while neither of the other two triangles have a 50∘ angle. That is, there is a part in Mark's triangle that is not congruent to any part of the other two triangles.
The triangle in Mark's notebook is not congruent to any of the other triangles.
Now, moving on to Madaelena's notebeook. Notice that the triangle has the same angle measures as the triangle in Kevin's notebook.
Before concluding that these two triangles are congruent, remember, all the corresponding parts have to be congruent. Therefore, the sides opposite to the 80∘ angle of each triangle should be congruent. Well, that is not the case.
It was a close call, but the triangle in Magdalena's notebook is not congruent to the triangle in Kevin's notebook. As a result, none of the triangles are congruent to the others.
The following figure is made of 5 triangles.
Notice that BF is a common side for △ABF and △DFB. Remember, if two sides or angles have the same number of marks, they are congruent.
To determine which pairs of triangles are congruent, pick one of them and compare its parts to the parts of the rest of the triangles. Start by comparing △AFG to △ABF. These two triangles have AF as a common side.
As with polygons, when it comes to writing a triangle congruence statement, the order in which the vertices are written is critical. Naming them in an incorrect order leads to erroneous conclusions. Consider, for example, the following congruent triangles.
Two polygons are congruent if and only if their corresponding sides and angles are congruent. |
Consider the following pair of triangles.
Dylan has written four different congruence statements on a piece of paper.
When describing congruent shapes, it is important when we write a congruence statement that the corresponding vertices come in the same order. In congruent triangles, vertices that are between the same two pairs of corresponding sides are corresponding. With this information, we can identify corresponding vertices.
Now we can write a congruence statement. △ABC ≅ △ FDE [-1em] A→ F, B → D, C→ E Immediately we can see that the first statement is correct. Let's color the vertices in the next three statement to check in which ones the letters are paired correctly. #2 △ BAC ≅ DFE ✓ #3 △ E DF ≅ C AB * #4 △ CAB ≅ EFD ✓ In the third statement, the letters are not paired correctly.
Consider the following pair of congruent triangles.
In congruent triangles, corresponding vertices have the same angle measures. Examining the diagram, we can identify which angles that are congruent by counting the number of angle markers. For example both ∠ B and ∠ F have three angle markers and are therefore congruent.
Let's identify the remaining corresponding vertices as well.
Let's pair the angles. ∠ A ≅ ∠ E ∠ B ≅ ∠ F ∠ C ≅ ∠ D
Corresponding sides are the sides in two congruent shapes that are between the same two pairs of corresponding vertices. For example in △ ABC, we see that BC is between the angles with two and three markers respectively. In △ EFD we see that DF is also between the angles with two and three markers respectively. Therefore, BC and DF are corresponding sides.
Let's identify the remaining corresponding sides in the same way.
Let's pair the sides. AB ≅ EF BC ≅ FD CA ≅ DE
In the following diagram, △XYZ≅△ONL.
Let's start by identifying the corresponding vertices by analyzing the congruence statement. △XYZ ≅ △ ONL [-1em] X→ O, Y → N, Z→ L Let's mark corresponding vertices and consequently which angles are congruent.
Now we know both m∠ Y and m∠ O. We can determine m∠ Z by using the Interior Angles Theorem. m∠ Z+30^(∘)+135^(∘) = 180^(∘) ⇓ m∠ Z=15^(∘) Now we can complete the statements. m∠ Y&=$135^(∘)$ [0.5em] m∠ O&=$30^(∘)$ [0.5em] m∠ Z&=$15^(∘)$
Find the measure of ∠R if △ABC≅△SQR.
Let's use the congruence statement to identify corresponding angles. △ABC ≅ △ SQR [-1em] A→ S, B → Q, C→ R With this information, we can identify the measures of ∠ S and ∠ Q as being 45^(∘) and 80^(∘) respectively.
Now we can find m∠ R by using the Interior Angles Theorem. 45^(∘)+80^(∘)+m∠ R = 180^(∘) ⇓ m∠ R = 55^(∘)
Consider the following triangles.
Using the congruence statement, we can match corresponding vertices.
Now we can identify the lengths of the different sides in △ XZY.
We can now complete the statements. XY&=$4$ [0.5em] XZ&=$3.8$ [0.5em] YZ&=$5.5$
Classmates Ali and Magdalena are investigating the relationship between two triangles. Ali claims that △ABC≅△YXZ while Magdalena says that △ZXY≅△CBA. Who is correct?
Let's identify corresponding vertices and mark them with the same color.
A correct congruence statement states corresponding vertices in the same order. With this in mind, let's check both statements.
Person | Congruence Statement | Correct order? | Valid statement? |
---|---|---|---|
Ali | △ A B C ≅△ Y XZ | Yes | Yes |
Magdalena | △ Z XY ≅ △ C BA | Yes | Yes |
Both are correct.