Sign In
| | 17 Theory slides |
| | 11 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| | Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
On the circle above, construct an angle with a vertex at the center of the circle. The angle being constructed should also cut off the same arc. In other words, construct the corresponding central angle.
Observe the measures of the angle and the arc intercepted by the angle. Start by moving $B$ so that $B,$ $O,$ and $A$ are collinear. Then, move it once again so that $B,$ $O,$ and $C$ are collinear.
As can be seen, when $B,$ $O,$ and $C$ are collinear, $\Seg{BC}$ becomes the diameter of the circle, and the angle cuts off the semicircle. Furthermore, the measure of $\Arc{BC}$ is twice the measure of an inscribed angle that intercepts it. This statement can be restated as a theorem.
The measure of an inscribed angle is half the measure of its intercepted arc.
In this figure, the measure of $\angle BAC$ is half the measure of $\overgroup{BC}.$
$m\angle BAC=\dfrac{1}{2}m\overgroup{BC}$
Consider Case II. A diameter can be drawn from $A$ through $O,$ dividing the inscribed angle into two.
Let the measures of $\angle BAD$ and $\angle DAC$ be $\alpha$ and $\beta,$ respectively.
Because the radii of a circle are all congruent, two isosceles triangles can be obtained by drawing $\Seg{OB}$ and $\Seg{OC}.$
Therefore, by the Isosceles Triangle Theorem, the measures of $\angle OBA$ and $\angle OCA$ will also be $\alpha$ and $\beta,$ respectively.
By the Triangle Exterior Angle Theorem, it is recognized that $m\angle BOD=2\alpha$ and $m\angle COD = 2\beta.$
The measure of an intercepted arc is the same as the measure of its central angle. Therefore, the measures of $\overgroup{BD}$ and $\overgroup{CD}$ are $2\alpha$ and $2\beta,$ respectively. \begin{gathered} m\overgroup{BD}=2\alpha \quad \text{and} \quad m\overgroup{CD}=2\beta \end{gathered} From here, using the Angle Addition Postulate and the Arc Addition Postulate, $m\angle BAC$ and $m\overgroup{BC}$ can be written in terms of $\alpha$ and $\beta.$ \begin{aligned} m\angle BAC &= \alpha + \beta\\[0.7em] m\overgroup{BC} &= 2\alpha + 2\beta \\[0.7em] m\overgroup{BC} &= 2\left(\alpha+\beta\right) \end{aligned} Consequentially, the measure of $\angle BAC$ is half the measure of $m\overgroup{BC}.$ The proof of Case II has been completed.
$m\angle BAC=\dfrac{1}{2}m\overgroup{BC}$
By applying similar logic as the procedure above, Case I and Case III can be proven.
In the diagram, the vertex of $\angle UVT$ is on the circle $O,$ and the sides of the angle are chords of the circle. Given the measure of $\Arc{UT}$, find the measure of the angle.
Write the answer without the degree symbol.
The arc intercepted by $\angle UVT$ measures $40\Deg.$
\Substitute{m\Arc{UT} }{\colIII{40\Deg}}
\Multiply
Therefore, $\angle UVT$ measures $20\Deg.$
Find the measure of the inscribed angle in the circle.
Similarly, given the measure of an inscribed angle, the measure of its corresponding central angle can be found using the Inscribed Angle Theorem. This can be done because the measure of the central angle is the same as the measure of the arc that the central angle cuts off.
In the circle, $\angle KLM$ measures $67\Deg.$
Find the measure of the corresponding central angle.
The arc $\Arc{KM}$ is included in $\angle KOM.$ Therefore, the measure of $\angle KOM$ is equal to the measure of $\Arc{KM}.$ Using the Inscribed Angle Theorem, the measure of $\Arc{KM}$ can be found.
\Substitute{m\angle KLM }{67\Deg}
Therefore, $\angle KOM$ also measures $134\Deg.$
Given the measure of an inscribed angle, find the measure of its corresponding central angle.
Up to now, the relationship between inscribed angles and their corresponding central angles has been discussed. Now the relationship between two inscribed angles that intercept the same arc will be investigated.
As can be observed, the angles are congruent, so long as they intercept the same arc.
If two inscribed angles of a circle intercept the same arc, then they are congruent.
By this theorem, $\angle ADB$ and $\angle ACB$ in the above diagram are congruent angles.
$\angle ADB \cong \angle ACB$
By the Inscribed Angle Theorem, the measures of $\angle ADB$ and $\angle ACB$ are half the measure of $\Arc{AB}.$ \begin{gathered} m\col{\angle ADB} = \dfrac{1}{2}m\colII{\Arc{AB}}\\[1em] m\colIV{\angle ACB} = \dfrac{1}{2}m\colII{\Arc{AB}} \end{gathered} Therefore, by the Transitive Property of Equality, it can be said that these two angles have the same measure. \begin{gathered} m\col{\angle ADB} = m\colIV{\angle ACB} \end{gathered} Consequently, by the definition of congruent angles, $\angle ADB$ and $\angle ACB$ are congruent.
$\angle ADB \cong \angle ACB$
Mark and Jordan have been asked to find the measure of $\angle G.$
Mark claims that the measure of $\angle G$ is the same as the measure of $\angle E.$ Jordan, however, thinks that its measure is half the measure of $\angle E.$ Who is correct?
By the Inscribed Angles of a Circle Theorem, $\angle E$ is congruent to $\angle H.$ \begin{gathered} \angle E \cong \angle H \\ \Updownarrow \\ m\angle E = m\angle H = 48\Deg \end{gathered} Accordingly, half the measure of $\angle E$ can be found as $\frac{48\Deg}{2}=24\Deg.$ Additionally, $\angle F$ and $\angle G$ intercept the same arc, $\Arc{EH}.$
Again by the Inscribed Angles of a Circle Theorem, $\angle F$ is congruent to $\angle G.$ Therefore, $m\angle G = 25\Deg.$ \begin{gathered} \angle F \cong \angle G \\ \Updownarrow \\ m\angle F =25\Deg = m\angle G \end{gathered} Since $m\angle G = 25\Deg,$ neither Mark's claim nor Jordan's claim is correct.
Inscribed angles, or the central angles, are not the only angles related to circles. In the next part, the angles constructed outside the circles will be examined. To construct an angle outside a circle, tangents can be used.
A line is a tangent to a circle if and only if the line is perpendicular to the endpoint of a radius on the circle's circumference.
Based on the diagram, the following relation holds true.
Line $m$ is tangent to $\odot Q$ $ \quad \Leftrightarrow\quad $ $m \perp \Seg{QP}$
Assume that line $m$ is tangent to the circle centered at $Q$ and not perpendicular to $\Seg{QP}.$ By the Perpendicular Postulate, there is another segment from $Q$ that is perpendicular to $m.$ Let that segment be $\colV{\overline{QT}}.$ The goal is to prove that $\overline{QP}$ must be that segment. The following diagram shows the mentioned characteristics.
Since $\overline{QT}$ is said to be perpendicular to $m,$ $\triangle QTP$ is a right triangle. In this case, $\Seg{QP},$ whose length is $r$ units, is the hypotenuse and, therefore, the longest side. As a result, $QT$ is less than $QP.$ \begin{aligned} \colV{QT} < \colII{QP} \end{aligned} There is a part of $\Seg{QT}$ that lies outside of the circle. Let $b$ be the length of that part. The other part of $\Seg{QT}$ is the radius of $\odot Q,$ because it is a segment from the center of the circle to a point on the circle.
By the Segment Addition Postulate, $\colV{QT}$ is equal to the sum of $\colIII{r}$ and $\col{b}.$ This expression, together with $QP=r,$ can be substituted into the aforementioned inequality.
\SubstituteExpressions
\SubIneq{< }{r}
Since a length cannot be less than $0,$ the assumption that $\Seg{QP}$ is not perpendicular to the line $m$ must be false. Therefore, $\Seg{QP}$ is perpendicular to the tangent $m$ at its endpoint on the circle. This concludes the first part of the proof.
Line $m$ is tangent to $\odot Q$ $ \quad \Rightarrow\quad $ $m \perp \Seg{QP}$
For the second part, it will be assumed that $m$ is perpendicular to the radius $\Seg{QP}$ at $P,$ and that line $m$ is not tangent to $\odot Q.$ In this case, line $m$ intersects $\odot Q$ at a second point $R.$
Since $m$ is said to be perpendicular to $\Seg{QP}$ at $P,$ $\triangle QPR$ is a right triangle and $\Seg{QR}$ is the hypotenuse. Therefore, $QP$ is less than $QR.$ \begin{gathered} \colIII{QP} < \col{QR} \end{gathered} However, it can also be seen that both $\Seg{QP}$ and $\Seg{QR}$ are radii of $\odot Q.$ Therefore, they have the same length. \begin{gathered}
\colIII{QP} = \col{QR}
\end{gathered} These two statements are contradictory to each other. Therefore, both cannot be true. The contradiction came from supposing that line $m$ was not tangent to $\odot Q.$ Consequently, $m$ must be a tangent line to the circle. This completes the second part of the proof.
$m \perp \Seg{QP}$ $ \quad \Rightarrow\quad $ line $m$ is tangent to $\odot Q$
Having proven both parts, the proof of the biconditional statement of the theorem is now complete.
Line $m$ is tangent to $\odot Q$ $ \quad \Leftrightarrow\quad $ $m \perp \Seg{QP}$
In the diagram, $\ell$ is tangent to the circle at the point $A,$ and $\Seg{DA}$ is a diameter.
If the measure of $\angle ABC$ is $60\Deg.$ Find the measure of $\Arc{DC}.$
Since the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a triangle is $180\Deg,$ $m\angle D=30 \Deg.$ \begin{aligned} 90\Deg + 60\Deg + m\angle ADB & = 180\Deg \\ m\angle ADB & = 30 \Deg \end{aligned} Notice that $\angle ACD$ is an inscribed angle on the diameter $\Seg{AD}$ of $\odot E.$ Therefore, $\angle ACD$ measures $90\Deg.$
Once again, using the Triangle Sum Theorem, the measure of $\angle DAC$ can be found to be $60\Deg.$ \begin{aligned} 90\Deg + 30\Deg + m\angle DAC & = 180\Deg \\ m\angle DAC & = 60 \Deg \end{aligned} Since $\Arc{DC}$ is associated with $\angle DAC$ and $m\angle DAC=60\Deg,$ the measure of the arc can be found using the Inscribed Angle Theorem.
\Substitute{ m\angle DAC }{60\Deg}
A circumscribed angle is supplementary to the central angle it cuts off.
The measure of a circumscribed angle is equal to $180\Deg$ minus the measure of the central angle that intercepts the same arc.
Considering the above diagram, the following relation holds true.
$m\angle ADB = 180\Deg -m\angle ACB$
Notice that $ADBC$ is a quadrilateral and two of its angles are right angles. Recall that the sum of all of the angles in a quadrilateral is $360\Deg.$ Substituting the known angle measures and solving for $m\angle ADB$ will give the desired equation.
\SubstituteII{m\angle DAC}{90\Deg}{m\angle CBD}{90\Deg}
This completes the proof.
Find the measure of the central angle.
The following example involving circumscribed angles and inscribed angles could require the use of the previously learned theorems.
Two tangents from $P$ to $\odot M$ are drawn. The measure of $\angle KPL$ is $40\Deg.$
Find the measure of the inscribed angle that intercepts the same arc as $\angle KPL?$
Substitute $m \angle KML$ into the above equation. \begin{aligned} m\angle KNL & = \dfrac{1}{2} \colIII{m \Arc{KL}} \\[0.8em] m\angle KNL & = \dfrac{1}{2} \colIII{m \angle KML} \end{aligned} Now, by the Circumscribed Angle Theorem, $m \angle KML$ is $180 \Deg$ minus $m \angle KPL.$ \begin{aligned} m\angle KNL = \dfrac{1}{2} (180\Deg -m \angle KPL) \end{aligned} It is given that $m \angle KPL = 40 \Deg.$ Substituting that measure into the equation will give the measure of the inscribed angle.
\Substitute{m \angle KPL}{40 \Deg}
This lesson defined three angles related to circles as well as the relationships between these angles. The diagram below shows the definitions and the main theorems of this lesson.
The known angle is the inscribed angle to the intercepted arc $\Arc{AB}.$ Additionally, $v$ is the central angle to the same intercepted arc. Since the central angle and its intercepted arc have the same measure, we know that $\Arc{AB}$ equals $v.$
According to the Inscribed Angle Theorem, the measure of an inscribed angle is half that of its intercepted arc.
Like in Part A, we have a central angle and an inscribed angle that both lie on the same intercepted arc. The intercepted arc has the same measure as its central angle.
Again, we can use the Inscribed Angle Theorem to obtain the measure of $v.$
Like in previous parts, we see that $\Arc{AB}$ is the intercepted arc to both the central angle $v$ and the inscribed angle $C.$ Let's mark the intercepted arc in the diagram.
Once more we will use the Inscribed Angles Theorem to find $v.$
What is the sum of w and u?
The 50^(∘)-angle and u are inscribed angles on the same intercepted arc. Therefore, according to the Inscribed Angles of a Circle Theorem, they are congruent.
Similarly, the 30^(∘)-angle and w are also on the same intercepted arc which means they are congruent.
Now that we know the value of both w and u, we can determine their sum. w+u=30^(∘)+50^(∘)=80^(∘)
Determine m∠ v.
Examining the diagram, we see that the angles ∠ BOC, ∠ AOB, and v together form a straight angle.
Therefore, if we can determine ∠ AOB, we can find m∠ v by subtracting ∠ BOC and ∠ AOB from 180^(∘). Notice that ∠ AOB is the central angle to the intercepted arc BA.
Using the Inscribed Angle Theorem, we can determine the measure of the intercepted arc BA.
Since the central angle and its intercepted arc have the same measure, we know that ∠ AOB equals 60^(∘).
Now we can determine the value of v. 70^(∘)+60^(∘)+v=180^(∘) ⇔ v= 50^(∘)
Determine m∠ x?
Examining the diagram, we see that one of the inscribed triangle's sides also is the diameter of the circle. Therefore, the intercepted arc AB has a measure of 180^(∘). According to the Inscribed Angles Theorem, we know that ∠ C must be a right angle.
Since we know two angles in the triangle, we can use the Interior Angles Theorem to determine m∠ x. m∠ A+m∠ B+m∠ C = 180^(∘) If we substitute m∠ A= m∠ x, m∠ B= 50^(∘), and m∠ C= 90^(∘), we can determine m∠ x.
We want to determine the measure of the arc $\Arc{BD}.$ Since the arc is described only with the endpoints $B$ and $D,$ it is referring to the minor arc. Let's highlight $\Arc{BD}$ on the circle.
Notice that $\angle BPA$ and $\angle BPD$ form a linear pair. This means that the sum of the angle measures is $180\Deg.$ \begin{aligned} m\angle BPA+m\angle BPD=180\Deg \end{aligned} If we substitute the value of $m\angle BPA$ in this equation, we can solve for $m\angle BPD.$
Since the central angle and the intercepted arc has the same measure we know that $m\Arc{BD}=139\Deg.$
This time we want to determine $m\Arc{ABC}.$ Since the arc is described with the endpoints $A$ and $C$ and a point $B$ on the arc, it is referring to the arc we can draw between $A$ and $C$ that also goes through $B.$
From Part A, we know that $m\Arc{ABD}$ has a measure of $180\Deg.$ Additionally, $\angle DPC$ and $\angle APB$ make a pair of vertical angles. Therefore, they are congruent according to the Vertical Angles Theorem. \begin{gathered} m\Arc{DPC}=41\Deg \end{gathered} With this information, we can determine the measure of $\Arc{ABD}.$ \begin{aligned} m\Arc{ABD}=180\Deg+41\Deg=221\Deg \end{aligned}