Sign In
An indirect proof, or proof by contradiction, is a proof method that uses indirect reasoning. Here, all possibilities are considered, and then all except one are proven false. Typically, in an indirect proof, there are two possibilities — a statement and its negation. The negation of the statement is eliminated by contradiction. Consider the following statement.
|
In a right triangle, the longest side is the hypotenuse. |
There are three steps to follow to prove a statement using an indirect proof.
Assume temporarily that the negation of the statement is true.
In a right triangle, the longest side is not its hypotenuse.
Since m∠ A = 90^(∘) and m∠ B is greater than m∠ A, the sum of the measures of these two angles is greater than 180^(∘). m∠ A + m∠ B > 180^(∘) According to the Interior Angles Theorem, the sum of the three interior angles of any triangle is equal to 180^(∘). m∠ A + m∠ B + m∠ C = 180^(∘) For this equation and the previously derived inequality to hold true, m∠ C must be less than 0. This conclusion contradicts the fact that the measures of all interior angles of any polygon are greater than 0.
| p | q | p ⇒ q | ¬ (p ⇒ q) | ¬ q | p ∧ ¬ q |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | T | T | F | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | F | F |
| F | F | T | F | T | F |
Therefore, assuming that the hypothesis p is true and the conclusion q is false will facilitate the process of deriving a contradiction. rc
Conditional Statement: & p ⇒ q Assume: & p and ¬ q