4. Proving Triangles Congruent-ASA, AAS
Sign In
Statements
|
Reasons
|
1. ∠ MJK ≅ ∠ KLM
|
1. Given
|
2. m∠ MJK = m∠ KLM
|
2. Definition of Congruent Angles
|
3. ∠ LMJ and ∠ KLM are supplementary
|
3. Given
|
4. m∠ LMJ + m∠ KLM=180
|
4. Definition of Supplementary Angles
|
5. m∠ LMJ + m∠ MJK=180
|
5. Substitution
|
6. ∠ LMJ and ∠ MJK are supplementary
|
6. Definition of Supplementary Angles
|
7. KJ ∥ LM
|
7. Converse of Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem
|
We will begin by highlighting the congruent angles in the given diagram, and also we will label ∠ LMJ.
m ∠ LMJ + m ∠ KLM = 180 Since ∠ MJK ≅ ∠ KLM we have that m ∠ MJK = m ∠ KLM. Let's substitute it in the equation above. m ∠ LMJ + m ∠ MJK = 180 The latter equation tells us that ∠ LMJ and ∠ MJK are supplementary, and from the diagram we know they are consecutive interior angles.
Consequently, by applying the Converse of Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem we obtain that KJ ∥ LM.
In the following table we summarize the proof we did above.
Statements
|
Reasons
|
1. ∠ MJK ≅ ∠ KLM
|
1. Given
|
2. m∠ MJK = m∠ KLM
|
2. Definition of Congruent Angles
|
3. ∠ LMJ and ∠ KLM are supplementary
|
3. Given
|
4. m∠ LMJ + m∠ KLM=180
|
4. Definition of Supplementary Angles
|
5. m∠ LMJ + m∠ MJK=180
|
5. Substitution
|
6. ∠ LMJ and ∠ MJK are supplementary
|
6. Definition of Supplementary Angles
|
7. KJ ∥ LM
|
7. Converse of Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem
|