McGraw Hill Integrated II, 2012
MH
McGraw Hill Integrated II, 2012 View details
4. Proving Triangles Congruent-ASA, AAS
Continue to next subchapter

Exercise 38 Page 371

Statements
Reasons
1.
∠ MJK ≅ ∠ KLM
1.
Given
2.
m∠ MJK = m∠ KLM
2.
Definition of Congruent Angles
3.
∠ LMJ and ∠ KLM are supplementary
3.
Given
4.
m∠ LMJ + m∠ KLM=180
4.
Definition of Supplementary Angles
5.
m∠ LMJ + m∠ MJK=180
5.
Substitution
6.
∠ LMJ and ∠ MJK are supplementary
6.
Definition of Supplementary Angles
7.
KJ ∥ LM
7.
Converse of Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem
Practice makes perfect

We will begin by highlighting the congruent angles in the given diagram, and also we will label ∠ LMJ.

Using that ∠ LMJ and ∠ KLM are supplementary, we can write the equation below.

m ∠ LMJ + m ∠ KLM = 180 Since ∠ MJK ≅ ∠ KLM we have that m ∠ MJK = m ∠ KLM. Let's substitute it in the equation above. m ∠ LMJ + m ∠ MJK = 180 The latter equation tells us that ∠ LMJ and ∠ MJK are supplementary, and from the diagram we know they are consecutive interior angles.

Consequently, by applying the Converse of Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem we obtain that KJ ∥ LM.

Two-Column Proof

In the following table we summarize the proof we did above.

Statements
Reasons
1.
∠ MJK ≅ ∠ KLM
1.
Given
2.
m∠ MJK = m∠ KLM
2.
Definition of Congruent Angles
3.
∠ LMJ and ∠ KLM are supplementary
3.
Given
4.
m∠ LMJ + m∠ KLM=180
4.
Definition of Supplementary Angles
5.
m∠ LMJ + m∠ MJK=180
5.
Substitution
6.
∠ LMJ and ∠ MJK are supplementary
6.
Definition of Supplementary Angles
7.
KJ ∥ LM
7.
Converse of Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem