Sign In
Therefore, the statement is false.
3(90^(∘))+m∠ θ = 360^(∘) ⇔ m∠ θ = 90^(∘) Since the last angle is also right, the quadrilateral is a rectangle.
From the diagram we can identify two pairs of congruent angles in the marked triangles. They are congruent according to the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem. With the given information, we can by the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) Congruence Theorem claim that the triangles are congruent.
As we can see, in a rhombus the diagonals do bisect each other. However, what happens if we enlarge one pair of sides forming a parallelogram? Let's try that.
As we can see, the diagonals still bisect each other when the quadrilateral is a parallelogram. Therefore, the statement is false.