Sign In
This comes down to your personal preferences. Do you like to run outside when it snows?
Type of statement | Statement | True or False? |
---|---|---|
Conditional statement | If it does not snow, then I will run outside. | False |
Converse statement | If I will run outside, then it does not snow. | False |
Inverse statement | If it snows, then I will not run outside. | False |
Contrapositive statement | If I do not run outside, then it snows. | False |
Let's consider each of the statements one at a time using the given p and q. p =& It does not snow q =& I will run outside
This is a false statement, as not snowing is not the only criteria for you running outside or not. You might be grounded, so even though it is not snowing you are not allowed to run out.
The converse of a conditional statement, q→ p, exchanges the hypothesis and the conclusion of the conditional statement. If I will run outside, then it does not snow. Again, it does not logically follow that if you run outside, it does not snow. What if you want to build a snowman or make a snow angel? Then you would run out when it snows.
The inverse of a conditional statement, ~ p→ ~ q, requires us to negate the hypothesis and the conclusion of the conditional statement. Note that the hypothesis already contains a not.
Therefore, when we negate the hypothesis we get a double negation, which is the same thing as erasing the original not.
If it snows,
then I will not run outside.
By the same logic we know the conditional and converse statements are false, we also know that the inverse is false.
The contrapositive of a conditional statement, ~ q→ ~ p, starts out with the converse of the conditional statement. Then we have to negate the hypothesis and the conclusion. Again, notice that negating the original hypothesis results in a double negation. If I do not run outside, then it snows. Again, using the same logic as before, we know the contrapositive is false.