{{ item.displayTitle }}

No history yet!

equalizer

rate_review

{{ r.avatar.letter }}

{{ u.avatar.letter }}

+

{{ item.displayTitle }}

{{ item.subject.displayTitle }}

{{ searchError }}

{{ courseTrack.displayTitle }} {{ statistics.percent }}% Sign in to view progress

{{ printedBook.courseTrack.name }} {{ printedBook.name }} In Algebra, a function is a relation in which each input value is mapped to exactly one output value. This notion of function can be extended to Geometry. However, the inputs and outputs are not going to be numbers but points.
### Catch-Up and Review

**Here are a few recommended readings before getting started with this lesson.**

In the applet below, four transformations can be applied to different polygons. Each transformation will affect the polygons in different ways.

Compare the original polygon and the polygon obtained after applying a transformation. In a few words, describe the effect of each transformation.

Consider the following pair of triangles. Here, $△ABC$ can be translated and rotated around point $P.$ Is there a way of combining these two transformations so that $△ABC$ is mapped onto $△XYZ?$ If so, describe the steps used.

Do not worry if the triangles cannot be mapped onto each other. Rather, consider the function $f(x)=x_{2}.$ For that function, there is no real value of $x$ for which the output is $-1!$ Remember this concept for later.

As stated at the beginning of this lesson, in Geometry, there are functions whose inputs and outputs are points. Such functions are called *transformations*.

A transformation is a function that changes a figure in a particular way — it can change the position, size, and orientation of a figure. The original figure is called the preimage and the produced figure is called the image of the transformation. To denote the image of a labeled point, a prime symbol is added next to the previous label.

Transformations are sometimes expressed as a mapping. That is, it maps the inputs to the outputs. Note that the input can be a single point. $T(x,y)→(x_{′},y_{′}) $

Here, $T$ is the transformation, $(x,y)$ are the coordinates of the points of the preimage, and $(x_{′},y_{′})$ are the coordinates of the points of the image.
Consider a transformation $T$ that translates a polygon. Below, its effect on polygon $P$ is shown.
### Answer

### Hint

### Solution

Compare the side lengths and angle measures between the preimage and the image. Based on this observation, what can be said about $T?$

Both $P$ and $P_{′}$ have the same side lengths and angle measures. For this reason, it can be established that $T$ does not affect the shape of $P,$ which means that $T$ preserves the side lengths and angle measures.

Use a ruler to find the side lengths of both polygons. To find the angle measures, use a protractor. Make a table comparing the dimensions of $P$ and $P_{′}.$

With the aid of a ruler, the side lengths of both polygons can be found.

Additionally, with the help of a protractor, the angle measures of both polygons can be determined.

It is beneficial to summarize the information about the side lengths and angle measures of both polygons in a table.

Dimensions of $P$ | Dimensions of $P_{′}$ |
---|---|

$AB=2.1$ cm | $A_{′}B_{′}=2.1$ cm |

$BC=2.4$ cm | $B_{′}C_{′}=2.4$ cm |

$CD=2$ cm | $C_{′}D_{′}=2$ cm |

$AD=1.5$ cm | $A_{′}D_{′}=1.5$ cm |

$m∠A=74_{∘}$ | $m∠A_{′}=74_{∘}$ |

$m∠B=92_{∘}$ | $m∠B_{′}=92_{∘}$ |

$m∠C=60_{∘}$ | $m∠C_{′}=60_{∘}$ |

$m∠D=134_{∘}$ | $m∠D_{′}=134_{∘}$ |

As it can be seen in the table, both polygons $P$ and $P_{′}$ have the same side lengths and angle measures. Therefore, it can be concluded that $T$ does **not** affect the shape of $P.$ In fact, $T$ only affects the position of the polygon.

The transformation $T$ preserves side lengths and angle measures.

It is important to note that the conclusion does not depend on the polygon but on the *effect* of $T$ on the polygon. By transforming different polygons, the same conclusion can be obtained.

A transformation $T$ rotates a polygon around a fixed point $Q.$ Magdalena and Ali are trying to determine whether or not $T$ modifies the shape of the polygon. Magdalena thinks that $T$ does not change the shape, while Ali believes it does. They decided to apply $T$ to a triangle.
### Hint

### Solution

Compare the side lengths and angle measures between the preimage and the image. Who is correct?

{"type":"choice","form":{"alts":["Ali","Magdalena"],"noSort":false},"formTextBefore":"","formTextAfter":"","answer":1}

For each triangle, use a ruler and a protractor to find the side lengths and angle measures, respectively. Make a table comparing the dimensions of $△JKL$ and $△J_{′}K_{′}L_{′}.$

With the aid of a ruler, the side lengths of both triangles can be found.

Next, with the help of a protractor, the angle measures of both triangles can be found.

The dimensions found can be summarized in a table.

Dimensions of $△JKL$ | Dimensions of $△J_{′}K_{′}L_{′}$ |
---|---|

$JK=2.2$ cm | $J_{′}K_{′}=2.2$ cm |

$KL=3.5$ cm | $K_{′}L_{′}=3.5$ cm |

$JL=1.7$ cm | $J_{′}L_{′}=1.7$ cm |

$m∠J=127_{∘}$ | $m∠J_{′}=127_{∘}$ |

$m∠K=23_{∘}$ | $m∠K_{′}=23_{∘}$ |

$m∠L=30_{∘}$ | $m∠L_{′}=30_{∘}$ |

As the table shows, both $△JKL$ and $△J_{′}K_{′}L_{′}$ have the same side lengths and angle measures. Therefore, $T$ does **not** affect the shape of the polygon. Consequently, Magdalena is correct.

The transformation $T$ preserves side lengths and angle measures.

It is important to note that the conclusion does not depend on the polygon chosen. Instead, the conclusion depends on the effect of $T$ on the polygon. By using different polygons, the same conclusion can be obtained.

Notice that the two transformations previously studied share the same property. The transformations neither affected the size nor the shape of the polygon. Still, they did affect the polygon's position on the plane. These types of transformations are called rigid motions.

A rigid motion, or **isometry**, is a transformation that preserves the distance of the points of the preimage. $AB=A_{′}B_{′} $

Because rigid motions preserve distances, there are two properties that can be inferred from the definition.

A rigid motion preserves the side lengths and angle measures of a polygon. As a result, a rigid motion maintains the exact size and shape of a figure. Still, a rigid motion can affect the position and orientation of the figure.

- A rigid motion preserves the side lengths of a polygon because, by definition, the distance between the vertices do not change.
- It is accepted without a proof that rigid motions also preserve angle measures.

Ali and Magdalena are now working with a new transformation $T.$ This transformation reflects a figure across a line as if the line was a *mirror*. In one of the attempts, they used a quadrilateral.
### Answer

### Solution

After seeing the result, Ali concluded that $T$ is a rigid motion. However, Magdalena said it is not. Who is correct? Why does Magdalena think that $T$ is not a rigid motion?

{"type":"choice","form":{"alts":["Ali","Magdalena"],"noSort":false},"formTextBefore":"","formTextAfter":"","answer":0}

Ali is correct, $T$ is a rigid motion. Magdalena could be confused because the transformation changes the orientation of the quadrilateral.

Using a ruler, the side lengths of both quadrilaterals can be found.

Next, with a protractor, the angle measures can be found.

In the table, all the dimensions found are summarized putting on the same row the dimensions of corresponding parts. For example, $AB$ and $A_{′}B_{′}$ will be in the same row.

Dimensions of $ABCD$ | Dimensions of $A_{′}B_{′}C_{′}D_{′}$ |
---|---|

$AB=2.8$ cm | $A_{′}B_{′}=2.8$ cm |

$BC=2.2$ cm | $B_{′}C_{′}=2.2$ cm |

$CD=1.8$ cm | $C_{′}D_{′}=1.8$ cm |

$AD=1.9$ cm | $A_{′}D_{′}=1.9$ cm |

$m∠A=72_{∘}$ | $m∠A_{′}=72_{∘}$ |

$m∠B=80_{∘}$ | $m∠B_{′}=80_{∘}$ |

$m∠C=88_{∘}$ | $m∠C_{′}=88_{∘}$ |

$m∠D=121_{∘}$ | $m∠D_{′}=121_{∘}$ |

As the table shows, both quadrilaterals $ABCD$ and $A_{′}B_{′}C_{′}D_{′}$ have the same side lengths and angle measures. This means that $T$ does **not** affect the shape of the polygon. Consequently, Ali is correct.

The transformation $T$ is a rigid motion.

Although $T$ is a rigid motion, notice that the orientation of the preimage and the image are not the same. In the preimage, the vertices from $A$ to $D$ are positioned counterclockwise, while in the image, they are positioned clockwise.

This fact could be what made Magdalena think that $T$ is not a rigid motion. Notice that the transformations studied before preserve orientations.

Consider a triangle and its image under a rigid motion drawn on a sketch pad. If the transformation is a translation or a rotation, by using a tracing paper the preimage can be mapped onto the image without peeling off the tracing paper from the sketch pad.
*rigid transformations* instead of rigid motions. Although all the transformations studied so far were applied to polygons, keep in mind that transformations can be applied to any point on the coordinate plane. The reason for using geometric shapes is that they make it easier to see the effect produced by a transformation and whether the transformation is a rigid motion or not.

Conversely, suppose that transformation is a reflection. In that case, it is not possible to map the preimage onto the image without peeling off the tracing paper from the sketch pad. The reason is that reflections change the orientation of the figures.

Mapping the preimage onto the image would necessitate folding the tracing paper along the line of reflection. However, by doing this the tracing paper peels off the sketch pad making a three-dimensional movement.

For this reason, reflections are sometimes called

Consider a triangle with vertices $A(-2,-1),$ $B(2,1),$ and $C(0,2).$

a Draw the image of $△ABC$ after increasing the $y-$coordinate of each point by $3$ units.

b Draw the image of $△ABC$ after doubling the $x-$coordinate of each point.

c Draw the image of $△ABC$ after changing the sign of the $y-$coordinate of each point.

d Draw the image of $△ABC$ after taking the absolute value of the $y-$coordinate of each point.

e Which of the above options represent rigid motions?

{"type":"multichoice","form":{"alts":["A","B","C","D"],"noSort":true},"formTextBefore":"","formTextAfter":"","answer":[0,2]}

a

b

c

d

e A and C are rigid motions. The operation given in part D is not even a transformation.

a Add $3$ to each $y-$coordinate.

b Multiply each $x-$coordinate by $2.$

c Multiply each $y-$coordinate by $-1.$

d The absolute value of a negative number is its opposite.

a This first operation requires adding $3$ units to the $y-$coordinate of each point while keeping the same $x-$coordinate. Start by performing this operation on the vertices of $△ABC.$

Original Vertex | Add $3$ to Each $y-$Coordinate | New Vertex |
---|---|---|

$A(-2,-1)$ | $(-2,-1+3)$ | $A_{′}(-2,2)$ |

$B(2,1)$ | $(2,1+3)$ | $B_{′}(2,4)$ |

$C(0,2)$ | $(0,2+3)$ | $C_{′}(0,5)$ |

Consequently, the transformation performed on $△ABC$ represents a translation $3$ units up. It can be checked that both $△ABC$ and $△A_{′}B_{′}C_{′}$ have the same dimensions. Therefore, this operation represents a rigid motion.

b Doubling each $x-$coordinate is the same as multiplying them by $2.$ This time, the $y-$coordinate remains unchanged.

Original Vertex | Double each $x-$Coordinate | New Vertex |
---|---|---|

$A(-2,-1)$ | $(2(-2),-1)$ | $A_{′}(-4,-1)$ |

$B(2,1)$ | $(2(2),1)$ | $B_{′}(4,1)$ |

$C(0,2)$ | $(2(0),2)$ | $C_{′}(0,2)$ |

The transformation performed on $△ABC$ is a horizontal stretch. It can be seen that the sides of $△A_{′}B_{′}C_{′}$ are longer than the sides of $△ABC.$ Also, the angle measures have changed. Consequently, this transformation is

c Changing the sign of each $y-$coordinate is the same as multiplying them by $-1.$ Here, the $x-$coordinates remain the same.

Original Vertex | Multiply Each $y-$Coordinate by $-1$ | New Vertex |
---|---|---|

$A(-2,-1)$ | $(-2,-1(-1))$ | $A_{′}(-2,1)$ |

$B(2,1)$ | $(2,1(-1))$ | $B_{′}(2,-1)$ |

$C(0,2)$ | $(0,2(-1))$ | $C_{′}(0,-2)$ |

In conclusion, the transformation performed on $△ABC$ is a reflection in the $x-$axis. It can be checked that both $△ABC$ and $△A_{′}B_{′}C_{′}$ have the same dimensions. Therefore, this transformation is a rigid motion.

d Recall that the absolute value of a positive number is the same number. Conversely, the absolute value of a negative number is its opposite.

Original Vertex | Taking the Absolute Value of Each $y-$Coordinate | New Vertex |
---|---|---|

$A(-2,-1)$ | $(-2,∣-1∣)$ | $A_{′}(-2,1)$ |

$B(2,1)$ | $(2,∣1∣)$ | $B_{′}(2,1)$ |

$C(0,2)$ | $(0,∣2∣)$ | $C_{′}(0,2)$ |

As the graph above illustrates, the shape of $△ABC$ was changed. Therefore, this operation is

foldedthe part of the triangle that is

These two points have the same image under this operation — $P_{′}(-0.5,0.5)$ and $Q_{′}(-0.5,0.5).$ This means that this is **not** a one-to-one operation. Consequently, it is **not** even a transformation!

e As previously stated, the transformations in parts A and C are rigid motions.

Consider the fact that two or more functions can be applied one after the other to an input. Similarly, two or more transformations can be applied one after the other to a preimage.

A composition of transformations, or **sequence of transformations**, is a combination of two or more transformations. In a composition, the image produced by the first transformation is the preimage of the second transformation. The notation is similar to the notation used for functions in algebra.

Magdalena and Ali were each given a rigid motion that they have to apply to pentagon $ABCDE$ one after the other in a particular order.

- Magdalena has to perform a translation of $2$ units to the right and $1$ down.
- Ali has to perform a $90_{∘}$ counterclockwise rotation about the origin.

Their teacher said that after applying both transformations in the correct order, the image of $B(-3,-2)$ is $B_{′′}(4,-4).$ Who should apply the transformation first?

{"type":"text","form":{"type":"point2d","options":{"comparison":"1","nofractofloat":false,"keypad":{"simple":true,"useShortLog":false,"variables":[],"constants":[]},"decimal":false,"function":false},"text":"<span class=\"katex\"><span class=\"katex-html\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/span><\/span>"},"formTextBefore":null,"formTextAfter":null,"answer":{"text1":"5","text2":"1"}}

If the point $(x,y)$ is rotated $90_{∘}$ counterclockwise about the origin, its new coordinates will be $(-y,x).$

Both compositions should be tried to determine what is the correct order. First, perform the translation followed by the rotation. Then, perform the rotation followed by the translation.

The table contains $B_{′′}$ and $C_{′′}$ — the images of $B$ and $C$ — after each composition is performed.

Preimage | Translation Followed by Rotation | Rotation Followed by Translation |
---|---|---|

$B(-3,-2)$ | $B_{′′}(3,-1)$ | $B_{′′}(4,-4)$ |

$C(-1,-4)$ | $C_{′′}(5,1)$ | $C_{′′}(6,−2)$ |

The teacher said that performing the transformations in the correct order maps $B(-3,-2)$ onto $B_{′′}(4,-4).$ This means that the correct order is the rotation followed by the translation. Therefore, Ali goes first. If the transformations are **not** performed in the correct order, the image of $C(-1,-4)$ is $C_{′′}(5,1).$

Keep in mind that transformations transcend beyond paper and can be used for many purposes. In the real world, transformations occur everywhere. For example, in nature, lakes perform reflections of landscapes.

Also, different types of transformations can be seen by observing a car, either in rest or in movement.

- A car moving in a straight line represents a translation.
- The wheels of a moving car show rotations.
- Rear-view and side-view mirrors make reflections.
- Even car windows make reflections, and depending on the object's position, they can also make distortions.

{{ 'mldesktop-placeholder-grade' | message }} {{ article.displayTitle }}!

{{ exercise.headTitle }}

{{ 'ml-heading-exercise' | message }} {{ focusmode.exercise.exerciseName }}