Sign In
Consider the Congruent Supplements Theorem.
No, see solution.
We are asked to prove the Vertical Angles Congruence Theorem. This theorem states that vertical angles are congruent. Our friend claims that this can be proven without using the Linear Pair Postulate. To determine whether our friend is correct, let's first examine the diagram that illustrates the situation.
From the diagram, we can see that both ∠ 1 and ∠ 3 form a linear pair with ∠ 2. Statement2)& ∠ 1 and ∠ 2 form a linear pair & ∠ 3 and ∠ 2 form a linear pair Reason2)& Definition of a linear pair, & as seen in the diagram Let's show this on the diagram.
Since ∠ 1 and ∠ 2 form a linear pair, by the Linear Pair Postulate, these angles are supplementary. Similarly, since ∠ 3 and ∠ 2 also form a linear pair, we can also say that they are supplementary. Statement3)& ∠ 1 and ∠ 2 are supplementary & ∠ 3 and ∠ 2 are supplementary Reason3)& Linear Pair Postulate Finally, using the Congruent Supplements Theorem, we can conclude that ∠ 1 is congruent to ∠ 3. Statement4)& ∠ 1≅ ∠ 3 Reason4)& Congruent Supplements & Theorem Let's now write this as a two-column proof.
Statements
|
Reasons
|
1. ∠ 1 and ∠ 3 are vertical angles
|
1. Given
|
2. & ∠ 1 and ∠ 2 are a linear pair &∠ 3 and ∠ 2 are a linear pair
|
2. Definition of a linear pair as seen in the diagram
|
3. & ∠ 1 and ∠ 2 are supplementary &∠ 3 and ∠ 2 are supplementary
|
3. Linear Pair Postulate
|
4. ∠ 1≅ ∠ 3
|
4. Congruent Supplements Theorem
|
As we can see, in the third row, we need to show that two angles which form a linear pair are supplementary. To do so, we have to use the Linear Pair Postulate. Therefore, our friend is not correct.