Sign In
This lesson provides a detailed exploration of the normal distribution in statistics, focusing on key concepts such as the empirical rule, z-score, standard deviation, and probability. It explains how these elements are interconnected and crucial for interpreting data sets. For instance, the empirical rule is used to determine what percentage of data falls within certain ranges in a normal distribution. The z-score helps in understanding how far a data point is from the mean, while standard deviation measures the dispersion of data points. Probability is also discussed, particularly its role in predicting outcomes based on a given data set. Overall, the material serves as a valuable lesson for those interested in understanding the intricacies of normal distribution and its applications in various fields, from social sciences to finance.
Show less Show more expand_more| Student Learning Objectives: |
|---|
|
| | 12 Theory slides |
| | 11 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| | Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
Most of the data is grouped next to the mean value, which is 9. Therefore, a man who wears a size 9.5 shoe is more likely to be randomly selected than a man who wears a size 11.5 shoe. When a data set is distributed this way and the domain of the distribution is continuous — not discrete — it is said that the data is normally distributed. This lesson explores this distribution.
Kevin has a summer internship at a tech company in his town. The daily number of calls that the company receives is normally distributed with a mean of 2240 calls and a standard deviation of 150 calls. The graph represents the distribution of the data.
Looking to make improvements in the company, Kevin's boss is interested in knowing the answers to the next couple of questions.
What is the probability that more than 2540 calls are received on a random day?
What is the probability that between 2300 and 2420 calls are received on a random day? Round the answer to two decimal places.
When dealing with probability distributions, there is one type that stands out above the rest because it is very common in different real-life scenarios like people's heights, shoe sizes, birth weights, average grades, IQ levels, and many qualities. Because of this regularity, this type of distribution is called the normal distribution.
A normal distribution is a type of probability distribution where the mean, the median, and the mode are all equal to each other. The graph that represents a normal distribution is called a normal curve and it is a continuous, bell-shaped curve that is symmetric with respect to the mean μ of the data set.
This type of distribution is the most common continuous probability distribution that can be observed in real life. When a normal distribution has a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1, it is called a standard normal distribution.
In statistics, the Empirical Rule, also known as the 68–95–99.7 rule, is a shorthand used to remember the percentage of values that lie within certain intervals in a normal distribution. The rule states the following three facts.
These three facts can be confirmed by observing the area under the normal curve that corresponds to a normal distribution with mean μ and standard deviation σ.
Empirical Rule.
In his spare time, Kevin works with the Less Chat, More Talk campaign to encourage people to share with their loved ones in person instead of through screens. He wants to give away T-shirts with a cool logo outside a shopping mall to help spread this message.
Kevin is in charge of preparing the men's T-shirts, but he does not know how many of each size he should order. To figure it out, he searched the City Hall website and he found that the heights of the men in the city are normally distributed with a mean of 183 centimeters and a standard deviation of 5 centimeters. Along with this information, there was also a graph.
What is the range of the heights that represent the middle 68 % of the distribution? Write the answer as a strict compound inequality.
What percent of the surveyed men are shorter than 173 centimeters?
If 3000 men participated in the survey, how many of them are between 188 and 193 centimeters tall?
Use the Empirical Rule to determine the corresponding percentage.
Use the Empirical Rule.
Use the Empirical Rule to find the percent. Then, multiply it by the total number of men surveyed.
According to the Empirical Rule, the middle 68 % of the data in a normal distribution falls in the range that starts one standard deviation to the left of the mean and ends one standard deviation to the right of the mean.
Middle68 % μ - σ < X < μ + σ
According to the website, the mean is 183 and the standard deviation is 5. Therefore, μ=183 and σ=5.
Middle68 % 183-5
Start by highlighting the corresponding interval in the graph.
Now, notice that 173 centimeters is 2 standard deviations to the left of the mean. μ - 2σ &= 183-2(5) &⇕ μ - 2σ &= 173 According to the Empirical Rule, 95 % of the data fall between μ-2σ and μ+2σ. It is known that the value of μ -2σ is 173. Calculate the value of μ +2σ. μ + 2σ &= 183+2(5) &⇕ μ + 2σ &= 193 Therefore, 95 % of the data fall between 173 and 193. This implies that 5 % of the data fall outside this range.
Due to the symmetry of the normal curve, 2.5 % of the data fall to the left of 173 and 2.5 % of the data fall to the right of 193. Consequently, 2.5 % of the men surveyed are shorter than 173 centimeters.
The graph below shows the percentages represented by each interval according to the Empirical Rule.
According to the graph, 13.5 % of the surveyed men are between 188 and 193 centimeters tall.
To find the number of men that belong to this range, multiply the corresponding percentage by the total number of men that participated in the survey.
a %=a/100
a/c* b = a* b/c
Calculate quotient
Therefore, of the 3000 men surveyed, about 405 are between 188 and 193 centimeters tall.
Given a normal distribution, it can be drawn by hand. For example, consider a normally distributed data set with a mean μ=10 and standard deviation σ=2. μ = 10 and σ = 2 Such distribution can be drawn following the next three steps.
| Labels to the Left of the Mean | Labels to the Right of the Mean |
|---|---|
| 10 - 1* 2 = 8 | 10 + 1* 2 = 12 |
| 10 - 2* 2 = 6 | 10 + 2* 2 = 14 |
| 10 - 3* 2 = 4 | 10 + 3* 2 = 16 |
Adding three labels to each side of the mean is enough.
While reading some statistics about the people in the city, Kevin was surprised to learn that the weights of newborns are also normally distributed. He found the following information given by the local hospital.
Graph the normal distribution labeling all the intervals and percentages.
What percent of the newborn babies weigh 6.3 pounds or more?
84 %
Start by drawing the axis and placing the mean in the middle. Determine the standard deviation. Write labels so that the length of each interval is 1 standard deviation. Then, draw the normal curve and use the Empirical Rule to label the percents.
Identify 6.3 in the graph from Part A. Shade the region to the right of 6.3 pounds and add the corresponding percentages.
To graph a normal distribution, draw a horizontal axis and place the mean of the data in the middle. According to the given information, the mean weight is μ =7 pounds.
The picture from the hospital shows that 6.3 pounds represents 1 standard deviation below the mean and that 7.7 pounds is 1 standard deviation above the mean. With this information, the standard deviation σ can be found. 7-σ &= 6.3 &⇕ σ &= 0.7 and 7+σ &= 7.7 &⇕ σ &= 0.7 The standard deviation of the weights of the babies is 0.7 pounds, so on the axis, write labels to the left and right of the mean such that each interval is 0.7 units long.
Next, draw the normal curve — a bell-shaped curve that is symmetric with respect to the mean, where it has its peak.
According to the Empirical Rule, the percentages below the curve are distributed as follows.
The percentages in every interval can be labeled by using the symmetry of the curve. This will complete the diagram of the distribution.
The percent of newborn babies that weigh 6.3 pounds or more corresponds to the region below the normal curve that is to the right of 6.3. Therefore, to calculate the percent of newborns that weigh 6.3 pounds or more, highlight this part of the graph.
The desired percentage is the sum of the individual percentages. 34 + 34 + 13.5 + 2.35 + 0.15 = 84 Consequently, 84 % of the newborn babies weigh 6.3 pounds or more.
The height of people is usually normally distributed. For example, the average height of a woman in the United States is about 162.5 centimeters. Assuming a standard deviation of 2.5 centimeters, the graph of this distribution looks as follows.
The Empirical Rule is used to determine the percentage of data that falls between any two labels on the axis. However, what about if the endpoints of the interval are different from the labels? For example, what is the percentage of women that are shorter than 166 centimeters?
To find such a percentage, the first step is converting the data value into its corresponding z-score.
The z-score, also known as the z-value, represents the number of standard deviations that a given value x is from the mean of a data set. The following formula can be used to convert any x-value into its corresponding z-score.
z=x-μ/σ
Using the previous formula, the value 166 can be converted into its z-score. In this case, μ=162.5 and σ = 2.5. z = 166-162.5/2.5 ⇔ z= 1.4 This means that the value 166 is 1.4 standard deviations to the right of 162.5. Once the corresponding z-score is known, the area below the curve that is to the left of this value can be found using a standard normal table.
Consider a standard normal distribution and a randomly chosen z-score. The area below the normal curve that is to the left of this z-score can be calculated using a standard normal table. For example, consider z=0.6.
The percentage of data that is less than or equal to z can be determined following three steps.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
The probability that corresponds to a z-score for which the integer part is 0 appears in the shaded row.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
To find the area below the normal curve and between two z-scores, subtract the area to the left of the smaller z-score from the area to the left of the greater z-score.
The area to the right of a z-score is the complement of the area to the left of the same z-score.
Since the area under the normal curve represents a probability, by the Complement Rule, these two probabilities add up to 1. P(z > z_1) + P(z ≤ z_1) = 1 Therefore, the area to the right of a z-score is the difference of 1 and the area to the left of the z-score.
P(z > z_1) = 1 - P(z ≤ z_1)
According to the standard normal table, the probability that a randomly selected value is less than or equal to 1.4 is 0.91924. Therefore, about 91.92 % of women are shorter than or equal to 166 centimeters.
Kevin has become a stats fan. He has recorded the time it takes him to commute to his internship over the past few days. He observes that the times are normally distributed with a mean of 17 minutes and a standard deviation of 2.5 minutes.
Find the following probabilities and write them in decimal form rounded to two decimal places.
What is the probability that Kevin's commute tomorrow will take less than 14 minutes?
What is the probability that Kevin's commute will take between 16 and 19 minutes next Monday?
Kevin starts work every day at 8:00AM. One day he leaves his house at 7:41AM. What is the probability that Kevin will be late for work this day?
Draw the normal distribution curve. If 14 is not one of the labels in the axis, then convert it into a z-score. Use a standard normal table to find the probability that a random value is less than the corresponding z-score.
Convert each value to its corresponding z-score. To find the desired probability, subtract the probability that a random value is less than the smallest z-score from the probability that a random value is less than the largest z-score.
How much time does Kevin have on this day to get from his house to work on time? Convert that time into a z-score. The probability of Kevin being late is equal to the probability a random value being greater than that z-score.
Start by drawing the normal distribution curve. According to Kevin, the mean time it takes him to get to work is 17 minutes, so this value should be located in the middle of the axis. The standard deviation is 2.5 minutes. The labels of the axis are found by adding and subtracting integer multiples of the standard deviation to and from the mean.
The probability that Kevin spends less than 14 minutes getting to work tomorrow is represented by the area below the curve that is to the left of 14.
Since 14 is not a label on the axis, the Empirical Rule cannot be used. Therefore, to find the area, first convert x=14 into its corresponding z-score.
Substitute values
Subtract term
Put minus sign in front of fraction
Calculate quotient
Now, in the standard normal table, locate the row corresponding to -1 and the column corresponding to .2.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
According to the table, the probability that tomorrow Kevin will spend less than 14 minutes traveling to work is about 0.12.
In the graph from Part A it can be seen that neither 16 nor 19 are labels on the axis.
Therefore, both values will need to be converted into their corresponding z-scores first. Recall that μ =17 and σ =2.5!
| z = x-μ/σ | ||
|---|---|---|
| x-value | Substitute | Simplify |
| 16 | z = 16- 17/2.5 | z = -0.4 |
| 19 | z = 19- 17/2.5 | z = 0.8 |
The shaded area represents the probability that a randomly selected value is greater than -0.4 and smaller than 0.8. In other words, the shaded area represents P(-0.4 < z < 0.8). P(-0.4 < z < 0.8) = P(z < 0.8) - P(z < -0.4) Each of these probabilities can be found using the standard normal table.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
Finally, to find the probability that Kevin will arrive within this time frame, calculate their difference and round the answer to two decimal places.
P(z < 0.8)= 0.78814, P(z < -0.4)= 0.34458
Subtract term
Round to 2 decimal place(s)
The probability that Kevin's commute will take between 16 and 19 minutes next Monday is about 0.44.
In order for Kevin to be on time, his commute cannot take more than 19 minutes. In other words, he will be late for work if it takes more than 19 minutes. This means that the probability that Kevin will be late for work that day is represented by the area below the normal curve that is to the right of 19.
Since 19 is not a label on the axis, the Empirical Rule cannot be used. Therefore, z-scores must be used to find the area. In Part B it was determined the z-score that corresponds to 19 is 0.8.
| Probability of Kevin Being Late | Probability of Kevin Being on Time |
|---|---|
| P(z> 0.8) | P(z≤ 0.8) |
Since the event of Kevin being late is the complement of the event of Kevin being on time, the sum of these probabilities is equal to 1. P(z > 0.8) + P(z ≤ 0.8) = 1 It was also determined in Part B that P(z ≤ 0.8) is 0.78814. Substitute this value into the equation above and solve for P(z > 0.8).
P(z ≤ 0.8)= 0.78814
LHS-0.78814=RHS-0.78814
Round to 2 decimal place(s)
The probability that Kevin will be late for work on that day is about 0.22.
The company Kevin is interning with plans to release a new smartphone. He goes with the research team to a stadium with a prototype to let different people use the phone in order to determine what features and design people like.
After comparing and contrasting size preference with the ages of the participants, Kevin realizes that the data is normally distributed. Additionally, he notices that the middle 46 % of participants prefer a larger phone.
Find the z-scores that correspond to the limits of the ages of the middle 46 % of people, those that prefer a larger phone. Write the limits from least to greatest, rounded to one decimal place.
The mean age of the participants was 19 years old and the standard deviation 5. With this information, determine the range of the ages that represent the middle 46 % of the distribution. Write the answer as a strict compound inequality.
Find the area that is to the left of the middle 46 %. Use a standard normal table to find the z-score that produces that area. Because a normal distribution is symmetrical, the upper bound is the opposite of the lower bound.
Convert the z-scores found in Part A into their original values.
Let z_1 and z_2 be the lower and upper limits of the middle 46 % of the data. To find the corresponding values, start by finding the percentage of data outside the middle area. To do so, subtract 46 % from 100 %.
Due to the symmetry of the normal curve, the area to the left of z_1 is equal to the area to the right of z_2. Therefore, each portion corresponds to 54÷ 2=27 % of the data. For the moment, focus on the area to the left of z_1.
According to the last graph, the probability that a randomly chosen value is less than z_1 is 0.27. In other words, P(z < z_1) = 0.27. Now, look for the z-value that produces a probability of 0.27 on a standard normal table.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
It is seen in the table that z_1=-0.6. Again, due to symmetry, z_2 is the opposite of z_1. Therefore, z_2=0.6.
Therefore, the limits of the middle 46 % of the data are z=-0.6 and z=0.6.
In Part A it was determined that the limits of the middle 46 % of the data are -0.6 and 0.6.
These z-scores can be converted back into their original age values in order to determine the range of ages that this area represents. To do so, start by rearranging the z-score formula to solve for x.
Kevin noted that the mean age is μ=19 and the standard deviation is σ=5. To find the first value of x, substitute these values and z=-0.6 into the equation and simplify.
Substitute values
(- a)b = - ab
a+(- b)=a-b
Subtract term
The age corresponding to z=-0.6 is 16. Now substitute z=0.6 to find the second age.
The age corresponding to z=0.6 is 22. Therefore, the middle 46 % of the data corresponds to people between 16 and 22 years old.
Based on the Kevin's data, people between the ages of 16 and 22 prefer a larger phone. 16 < X < 22
One interesting property of a normal distribution is that it can take any value as its mean and any non-negative value as its standard deviation. Because of this, comparing two normally distributed data sets has to be done carefully. Otherwise, erroneous conclusions can be made.
Any normal distribution with mean μ and standard deviation σ can be converted into a standard normal distribution. For example, consider a normal distribution with μ=35 and σ=1.22. To standardize the distribution, all its values have to be converted into their corresponding z-scores.
Since the domain is continuous, the conversion cannot be manually done for all the values. However, for illustrative purposes, it will be performed for the data set {33, 34, 34, 35, 35, 35, 36, 36, 37}. Two steps will be followed.
| x | x-μ |
|---|---|
| 33 | 33-35 |
| 34 | 34-35 |
| 34 | 34-35 |
| 35 | 35-35 |
| 35 | 35-35 |
| 35 | 35-35 |
| 36 | 36-35 |
| 36 | 36-35 |
| 37 | 37-35 |
Notice that translating the values will not changed the standard deviation. The standard deviation of the new data set is still 1.22.
The initial data set has been converted into {-2, -1, -1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2}.
| x | x-μ/σ | z-Score |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | 33-35/1.22 | -1.64 |
| 34 | 34-35/1.22 | -0.82 |
| 34 | 34-35/1.22 | -0.82 |
| 35 | 35-35/1.22 | 0 |
| 35 | 35-35/1.22 | 0 |
| 35 | 35-35/1.22 | 0 |
| 36 | 36-35/1.22 | 0.82 |
| 36 | 36-35/1.22 | 0.82 |
| 37 | 37-35/1.22 | 1.64 |
After the standardization, the new data set is {-1.64, -0.82, -0.82, 0, 0, 0, 0.82, 0.82, 1.64}. Here, the mean is 0 and the standard deviation 1.
Notice that the resulting curve has a similar shape and distribution of data values as the original.
Kevin's friend LaShay took the SAT and scored 640 points on the math section. Kevin took the ACT and scored 28.32 points in the math section.
Since these tests use different scales — the math section of the SAT scores 800 points while the math section of the ACT scores 36 points — they wonder who did better. They looked at the stats for each test to find out.
Compared to their corresponding classmates, who stood out more, Kevin or LaShay?
Kevin took the ACT with 2000 people, including himself. How many people scored higher than Kevin?
What is the probability that a randomly chosen classmate of LaShay's has scored less than or equal to her on the SAT math section? Do not round the answer.
The university where LaShay wants to study will accept only the top 100 math scores. If LaShay took the SAT with 1000 people, including herself, will she be accepted?
Use the z-score found in Part A and the standard normal table to find the percentage of people who scored lower than Kevin. Then, apply the Complement Rule. Multiply the percentage by the total number of people who took the test.
Use the z-score found in Part A and the standard normal table.
Use the probability found in Part C and the Complement Rule to determine how many people scored higher than LaShay. Are there more than 100 people?
Since the scores of both tests are normally distributed, to determine who did better, graph both normal distributions. According to the stats Kevin and LaShay found, the mean of the SAT is 523 and the standard deviation is 90. On the other hand, the mean of the ACT is 21 and the standard deviation is 6.1.
Now Kevin's and LaShay's scores will be placed on the horizontal axis of their corresponding test. The score that is further to the right of the mean will tell who stood out the most compared to their class.
Unfortunately, it cannot be determined which score is further to the right of the mean just by looking at the graphs. Since the z-scores tell the number of standard deviations above or below the mean that a value is, it is convenient to find the corresponding z-scores. z = x-μ/σ Since it will be further to the right of the mean, the higher positive z-score corresponds to the person who did better.
| Score | Mean | Standard Deviation | z=x-μ/σ | z-score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaShay | 640 | 523 | 90 | z = 640-523/90 | z = 1.3 |
| Kevin | 26.52 | 21 | 6.1 | z = 26.52-21/6.1 | z = 1.2 |
LaShay's z-score is greater than Kevin's z-score. This means that her score is further to the right of the mean. Consequently, LaShay excelled more in her class than Kevin did in his.
The percentage of people who scored higher than Kevin is represented by the area below the normal curve and to the right of Kevin's score.
Since Kevin's score is not of the form μ+ k σ, the Empirical Rule cannot give the required area. However, it can be found by using z-scores. From Part A, the z-score that corresponds to Kevin's score is 1.2. Therefore, the area is P(z > 1.2) and can be computed as follows by the Complement Rule. P(z> 1.2) = 1 - P(z ≤ 1.2) Using a standard normal table, the percentage of people who scored less than or the same as Kevin can be determined. Keep in mind that the table has the percentages written as decimal numbers.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
From the table, it is seen that P(z≤ 1.2) is 0.88493. Next, substitute it into the last equation. P(z> 1.2) = 1 - 0.88493 ⇕ P(z> 1.2)=0.11507 Consequently, 11.507 % of people scored higher than Kevin. To find out how many people this percentage represents, multiply it by 2000. 11.507 %* 2000 = 230.14 In this context, only whole numbers make sense. Therefore, it can be concluded that about 230 people scored higher than Kevin on the math portion of the ACT.
Similarly to Part B, the probability that a randomly chosen classmate of LaShay's has scored less than or equal to her on the SAT is given by the area below the normal curve and to the left of her score.
As before, the Empirical Rule is not helpful because LaShay's score is not of the form μ + kσ. Therefore, the area will be found using z-scores. The z-score that corresponds to 640 was found to be 1.3 in Part A. This means that the area is given by P(z≤ 1.3), which can be found on the standard normal table.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
The probability that a randomly chosen classmate of LaShay's has scored less than or equal to her is 0.90320.
To determine whether LaShay will be accepted by the university, find the number of people who scored higher than she did on the SAT math section. Part C found that 90.32 % of people scored less than or equal to LaShay. The number of people who scored higher than she did can be found by subtracting this percentage from 100 %.
100 % - 90.32 % = 9.68 % Of the 1000 people who took the SAT test, 9.68 % scored higher than LaShay. To figure out how many people this represents, multiply this percentage by 1000. 1000* 9.68 % = 96.8 people In this context, only whole numbers make sense. After rounding down, it can be said that about 96 people scored higher than LaShay did. This means that she is in the top 100 math scores and the university will therefore accept her.
In the challenge presented at the beginning, it was said that Kevin has a summer internship at a tech company. The daily number of calls the company receives is normally distributed with a mean of 2240 calls and a standard deviation of 150 calls. The corresponding normal curve is represented in the following graph.
In order to improve the company, Kevin's boss is interested in knowing the answer to the next couple of questions.
What is the probability that on a random day more than 2540 calls are received?
What is the probability that on a random day, between 2300 and 2420 calls are received? Round the answer to two decimal places.
Use the Empirical Rule.
Convert each number into a z-score. Use the standard normal table to find the area to the left of each z-score. Subtract the smaller area from the greater area.
The probability that on a random day more than 2540 calls are received is the area below the curve that is to the right of 2540.
Notice that 2540 is exactly two standard deviations above the mean. Therefore, the required area can be found by using the Empirical Rule. This rule tells the percentage of data that fall within certain intervals. The graph below shows the distribution divided into labeled intervals according to the Empirical Rule.
The area to the right of 2540 can be found by adding the two percentages at the far right. 2.35 % + 0.15 % = 2.5 % Consequently, the probability that more than 2540 calls are received on a random day is 0.025
The probability that between 2300 and 2420 calls are received on a random day is given by the area below the normal curve that is between 2300 and 2420.
This time, neither of the limits has the form μ+kσ. This means that the Empirical Rule is not useful. Nevertheless, the required area can be found with z-scores. z = x-μ/σ Substitute x=2300 and x=2420 into the formula. Remember that μ=2240 and σ = 150.
| x-value | z = x-μ/σ | z-score |
|---|---|---|
| 2300 | z = 2300-2240/150 | 0.4 |
| 2420 | z = 2420-2240/150 | 1.2 |
The table shows that 2300 is 0.4 standard deviations above the mean and that 2420 is 1.2 standard deviations above the mean. To find the desired probability, subtract the smaller area from the greater area.
The area can be found by using the following equation. P(0.4 ≤ z ≤ 1.2) = P(z ≤ 1.2) - P(z ≤ 0.4) The two values on the right-hand side can be found using a standard normal table.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
Finally, substitute these two values into the last equation and round the answer to two decimal places.
P(z ≤ 1.2)= 0.88493, P(z ≤ 0.4)= 0.65542
Subtract term
Round to 2 decimal place(s)
Consequently, the probability that between 2300 and 2420 calls are received on a random day is about 0.23.
In Part A, the value 2540 is two standard deviations to the right of the mean. Therefore, its z-score is 2. To find the area below the curve that is to the right of z=2, follow these three steps in the calculator.
ShadeNorm(.
DRAW.
Notice that the result obtained here, rounded to three decimal places, is 0.023 while the Empirical Rule said the result was 0.025. This slight difference comes from the fact that the Empirical Rule rounds some of the percentages. For Part B, the z-scores are the following. z_1 = 0.4 and z_2 = 1.2 To find the area between 0.4 and 1.2, the first two steps are the same. However, in the third step, set 0.4 as the lower limit and 1.2 as the upper limit.
Consequently, P(0.4 ≤ z ≤ 1.2) is about 0.23.
The steps for computing the area below the original normal curve are quite similar. But here, the window size has to be carefully adjusted. In general, the values should have the following form. Xmin &= μ - 4σ & Ymin &= Ymax/2 [0.2cm] Xmax &= μ + 4σ & Ymax &= 1/sqrt(2π)* σ Xscl &= σ & Yscl &= 1 For Part A, use the following window settings.
In the third step set the values corresponding to the distribution and press DRAW.
As seen, the result obtained is the same as before. Finally, for Part B, keep the window settings and only update the lower and upper limits.
The heights of people in a group are normally distributed with a mean of 69 inches and a standard deviation of 2.5 inches.
How many people are in the group if there are 1714 people whose heights are between 66.75 and 72.25 inches? Round the answer to the nearest integer.
Let's begin by finding the percentage of data that is between 66.75 and 72.25 inches. To do so, we will draw the normal distribution curve. The heights of are normally distributed with a mean of 69 inches and a standard deviation of 2.5 inches. Remember, the labels of the axis are found by adding and subtracting integer multiples of the standard deviation to and from the mean.
The probability for the number of people between 66.75 and 72.25 is represented by the area below the curve between 66.75 and 72.25.
Since x_1= 66.75 and x_2= 72.25 are not the labels of the axis, the Empirical Rule cannot be used. Therefore, to find the area, we will first convert these values into their corresponding z-scores. Recall that μ = 69 and σ = 2.5!
| z = x-μ/σ | ||
|---|---|---|
| x-value | Substitute | Simplify |
| 66.75 | z = 66.75- 69/2.5 | z = -0.9 |
| 72.25 | z = 72.25- 69/2.5 | z = 1.3 |
The shaded area represents the probability that a randomly selected value is greater than -0.9 and smaller than 1.3. In other words, the shaded area represents P(-0.9 < z < 1.3). P(-0.9 < z < 1.3) = P(z < 1.3) - P(z < -0.9) We can find each of these probabilities using the standard normal table.
| .0 | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | .5 | .6 | .7 | .8 | .9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3 | .00135 | .00097 | .00069 | .00048 | .00034 | .00023 | .00016 | .00011 | .00007 | .00005 |
| -2 | .02275 | .01786 | .01390 | .01072 | .00820 | .00621 | .00466 | .00347 | .00256 | .00187 |
| -1 | .15866 | .13567 | .11507 | .09680 | .08076 | .06681 | .05480 | .04457 | .03593 | .02872 |
| -0 | .50000 | .46017 | .42074 | .38209 | .34458 | .30854 | .27425 | .24196 | .21186 | .18406 |
| 0 | .50000 | .53983 | .57926 | .61791 | .65542 | .69146 | .72575 | .75804 | .78814 | .81594 |
| 1 | .84134 | .86433 | .88493 | .90320 | .91924 | .93319 | .94520 | .95543 | .96407 | .97128 |
| 2 | .97725 | .98214 | .98610 | .98928 | .99180 | .99379 | .99534 | .99653 | .99744 | .99813 |
| 3 | .99865 | .99903 | .99931 | .99952 | .99966 | .99977 | .99984 | .99989 | .99993 | .99995 |
Finally, to find the probability, calculate the difference between the probabilities found in the table.
The probability is 0.71914. This means that 71.914 % of the people are between 66.75 and 72.25 inches tall. Since there are 1714 people between 66.75 and 72.25, we can find the total number of people in the group by dividing 1714 by 71.914 %. 1714/71.914 %=2383.402397... Therefore, there are 2383 people in total.
Jimmy weighs 212.4 pounds and his friend, Tasha, weighs 183.5 pounds.
The information about the weights of men and women in the US are given as follows.
Based on this information, which of the following statements is true?
Let's begin by drawing the normal curves for both groups to compare Jimmy's and Tasha's weights. Note that the weights of men are normally distributed with a mean of 198 pounds and a standard deviation of 18 pounds. On the other hand, the weights of women are normally distributed with a mean of 170 pounds and a standard deviation of 15 pounds.
Now Jimmy's and Tasha's weights will be placed on the horizontal axis of their corresponding group. The weight that is further to the right of the mean will tell who is heavier compared to their group.
Unfortunately, it is not easy to determine which weight is further to the right of the mean just by looking at the graphs because their scales are different. Since the z-scores tell the number of standard deviations above or below the mean that a value is, it is convenient to find the corresponding z-scores.
z = x-μ/σ
Since it will be further to the right of the mean, the higher positive z-score corresponds to the person who is relatively heavier than the other.
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | z=x-μ/σ | z-score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy | 212.4 | 198 | 18 | z = 212.4- 198/18 | z = 0.8 |
| Tasha | 183.5 | 170 | 15 | z = 183.5- 170/15 | z = 0.9 |
Tasha's z-score is greater than Kevin's z-score. This means that her weight is further to the right of the mean. Consequently, Tasha is relatively heavier than Jimmy.