| {{ 'ml-lesson-number-slides' | message : article.intro.bblockCount }} |
| {{ 'ml-lesson-number-exercises' | message : article.intro.exerciseCount }} |
| {{ 'ml-lesson-time-estimation' | message }} |
Here are a few recommended readings before getting started with this lesson.
In the following applet, four figures are shown. One of the three figures at the bottom is the result of applying a rigid motion or a sequence of rigid motions to the upper figure. Match the preimage with its image.
When working with the different types of rigid motions, it was used that they map a segment into another segment. To verify that this is true, consider a segment AB and any rigid motion. Let C be the image of A and D the image of B.
Because rigid motions preserve distances, CD is equal to AB. Now, to check that every point of AB was actually mapped onto CD, consider a point P on AB different from the endpoints. Let Q be the image of P under the rigid motion.
The idea is to show that Q lies on CD between C and D. To do this, it must be checked that CQ+QD is equal to CD. Again, since rigid motions preserve distances, CQ=AP and QD=PB.(I): Add II
(I): Segment Addition Postulate
(I): AB=CD
Rigid motions map n-sided polygons onto n-sided polygons.
Consider a rigid motion and a circle C.
Since rigid motions preserve distances, the image of C is a circle whose radius is equal to the radius of C. Therefore, C′ is the circle centered at P′ and radius r.
The image of C is a circle centered at P′ with radius PQ. Since PQ and P′Q′ are equal, C′ is the circle centered at P′ passing through point Q′.
Since rigid motions map segments into congruent segments and angles into congruent angles, rigid motions can be used to define when a pair of geometric figures are congruent.
≅is used.
Emily and her family are spending the weekend at a lake house. On Saturday afternoon, Emily begins to work on her geometry homework that asks her to determine if the following pair of polygons are congruent.
Unfortunately, Emily left her ruler and protractor at her house and only brought a pencil and a piece of tracing paper.
When two figures are not congruent, no sequence of rigid motions maps one figure onto the other. Even so, it is possible that a rigid motion maps certain parts of the preimage onto their corresponding parts, but not all. For example, consider the following pair of quadrilaterals.
A translation can map AB onto PQ. However, the remaining parts of ABCD do not match the parts of PQRS. Equivalently, CD can be mapped onto RS by a translation. Still, the remaining parts do not match as before.Consider the following pair of quadrilaterals ABCD and PQRS in the coordinate plane.
Furthermore, consider the following sequences of transformations.
Use the orientation of both quadrilaterals to discard one of the sequences. Then, apply the remaining sequences to ABCD, one at a time, to find the image. Compare the image to PQRS.
To determine if any of the given sequences maps ABCD onto PQRS, apply them to ABCD, one at a time, and compare each resulting image to PQRS.
In the following applet, the left-hand side polygon can be translated and rotated.
By applying these rigid motions, determine whether the given pair of polygons are congruent.
Because of copyright, in marketing, two different companies cannot have the same name or logo. Here, knowing how to determine if two figures are congruent is useful in dealing with intellectual property. Sometimes lesser-known brands use logos almost congruent to those of well-known brands. The intention is to receive instant recognition. For instance, consider the well-known logo of MathLeaks and the logo of a startup company called MathLovers.
Even though the two logos appear to be the same, there is no rigid motion that maps one logo onto the other. Therefore, they are not congruent. Consequently, there is no legal issue.Congruent figures are everywhere in daily life. For example, the figures formed by lines on one half of a basketball court are congruent to the figures formed on the other half. However, verifying this congruence through rigid motions is a difficult thing to do, given the circumstance of not being able to see the rigid motions occur.
Therefore, it would be convenient to find a way of determining whether two figures are congruent without using rigid motions. The good news is that there is a simpler way for polygons, which will be studied in the next lesson.