Sign In
| Student Learning Objectives: |
|---|
|
| | 11 Theory slides |
| | 6 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| | Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
In the following applet, four figures are shown. One of the three figures at the bottom is the result of applying a rigid motion or a sequence of rigid motions to the upper figure. Match the preimage with its image.
When working with the different types of rigid motions, it was used that they map a segment into another segment. To verify that this is true, consider a segment AB and any rigid motion. Let C be the image of A and D the image of B.
Because rigid motions preserve distances, CD is equal to AB. Now, to check that every point of AB was actually mapped onto CD, consider a point P on AB different from the endpoints. Let Q be the image of P under the rigid motion.
The idea is to show that Q lies on CD between C and D. To do this, it must be checked that CQ+QD is equal to CD. Again, since rigid motions preserve distances, CQ=AP and QD=PB. CQ=AP & (I) QD=PB & (II) Next, Equations (I) and (II) can be added together and simplified using the Segment Addition Postulate.
(I): Add II
(I): Segment Addition Postulate
(I): AB= CD
Rigid motions map n-sided polygons onto n-sided polygons.
Consider a rigid motion and a circle C.
Since rigid motions preserve distances, the image of C is a circle whose radius is equal to the radius of C. Therefore, C' is the circle centered at P' and radius r.
The image of C is a circle centered at P' with radius PQ. Since PQ and P'Q' are equal, C' is the circle centered at P' passing through point Q'.
The image of C is a circle passing through A', B', and C'. Next, find the center of C' by drawing the perpendicular bisectors of A'B' and B'C'.
The point of intersection of the perpendicular bisectors is the center of C'. That way, the image of C can be drawn.
Since rigid motions map segments into congruent segments and angles into congruent angles, rigid motions can be used to define when a pair of geometric figures are congruent.
Two figures are congruent figures if there is a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one of the figures onto the other. As a result, congruent figures have the same size and shape. To denote algebraically that two figures are congruent, the symbol ≅
is used.
ABCDE ≅ JKLMN or CDEAB ≅ LMNJK
Emily and her family are spending the weekend at a lake house. On Saturday afternoon, Emily begins to work on her geometry homework that asks her to determine if the following pair of polygons are congruent.
Unfortunately, Emily left her ruler and protractor at her house and only brought a pencil and a piece of tracing paper.
Then, draw one of the figures on tracing paper and translate it so that the corresponding vertices match each other.
Since the rest of the vertices do not match, a single translation is not enough to map one figure onto the other. The next step is to try to match a pair of corresponding sides. To do so, rotate the paper about the matching vertices.
As seen, the rest of the sides still do not match. Therefore, another transformation is needed. Notice that the two given polygons have opposite orientations, which suggests that performing a reflection is helpful. In this case, the line of reflection is the line containing the matching sides.
This time, all sides of both figures match.
When two figures are not congruent, no sequence of rigid motions maps one figure onto the other. Even so, it is possible that a rigid motion maps certain parts of the preimage onto their corresponding parts, but not all. For example, consider the following pair of quadrilaterals.
A translation can map AB onto PQ. However, the remaining parts of ABCD do not match the parts of PQRS. Equivalently, CD can be mapped onto RS by a translation. Still, the remaining parts do not match as before.
Consider the following pair of quadrilaterals ABCD and PQRS in the coordinate plane.
Furthermore, consider the following sequences of transformations.
Are the given quadrilaterals congruent?
In the affirmative case, which of the listed sequences maps ABCD onto PQRS?
At first glance, it seems like the two quadrilaterals have opposite orientations. If this is true, the first sequence cannot map ABCD onto PQRS because both translations and rotations maintain the orientation. To verify it, apply the sequence to ABCD.
Sequence 1 maps only AB onto PQ. The remaining parts do not match. Consequently, Sequence 1 does not map ABCD onto PQRS.
A glide reflection is the composition of a reflection and a translation performed in any order. Since a reflection is involved, this sequence is a good candidate. To apply it to ABCD, start with the reflection.
Next, the translation along v=⟨ 3,-3⟩ will be applied.
As can be seen, the given glide reflection mapped ABCD onto PQRS. Therefore, the given quadrilaterals are congruent.
Like the previous sequence, this third sequence also involves a reflection and thus it is a good candidate. Here, the rotation is applied first. Since it is a 180^(∘) rotation, the direction of the rotation will not affect the resulting image.
Next, reflect the resulting image across the line y=x.
As the diagram shows, this sequence does not map ABCD onto PQRS. As a result, only the second sequence of transformations maps ABCD onto PQRS.
In the following applet, the left-hand side polygon can be translated and rotated.
By applying these rigid motions, determine whether the given pair of polygons are congruent.
Because of copyright, in marketing, two different companies cannot have the same name or logo. Here, knowing how to determine if two figures are congruent is useful in dealing with intellectual property. Sometimes lesser-known brands use logos almost congruent to those of well-known brands. The intention is to receive instant recognition. For instance, consider the well-known logo of MathLeaks and the logo of a startup company called MathLovers.
Congruent figures are everywhere in daily life. For example, the figures formed by lines on one half of a basketball court are congruent to the figures formed on the other half. However, verifying this congruence through rigid motions is a difficult thing to do, given the circumstance of not being able to see the rigid motions occur.
Paulina is intrigued by the following polygons in her textbook.
She sees that the angles are all congruent, and therefore, she says that the polygons are congruent. Is Paulina correct in this case?
Two figures are congruent if they have the same shape and size. For the two polygons Paulina is fixated, we only know that the corresponding angles are congruent. However, there is no information about the size. Therefore, we do not have enough information to determine if they are congruent. Paulina, in this case, is not right.
While it is not required for us to determine if the polygons are congruent to get our answer, let's think about how we could figure that out if it were. We could use rigid motions. If two shapes are congruent, then it is possible to map one shape onto the other by a sequence of rigid motions. The following illustration demonstrates a general situation.
As we can see, the vertices and sides of the polygons map onto each other perfectly. That means they have the same shape, size, and are congruent.
Let's see if we can map the corresponding vertices and sides onto each other only through rigid motions.
If we enlarge a section of this diagram we can see that the polygons do not map onto each other.
That means they are not congruent. They do not have the same size. When determining congruence, it is important to not only trust our eyes but actually confirm what we think we see.