Sign In
| | 8 Theory slides |
| | 7 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| | Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
In a multiple-choice test, Davontay randomly selected the answers to all five questions. Each question had two options to choose from.
To find out about the voting behavior of people according to their age, a survey was conducted outside of a polling station. The following table shows some data about the presidential election in 2016 between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
| Clinton | Trump | |
|---|---|---|
| Young Adults (18-29 years old) | 55 | 36 |
| Adults (30-44 years old) | 51 | 41 |
| Middle-Aged Adults (45-64 years old) | 44 | 52 |
| Seniors (65+ years old) | 45 | 52 |
Find the following conditional probabilities and describe their meaning in everyday words. Round each answer to two decimal places.
Descriptions:
Alternative description: If a person is selected at random among the surveyed young adults, there is a 60 % chance they voted for Clinton and a 40 % chance they voted for Trump.
Descriptions:
Alternative description: If a person that voted for Clinton is selected at random, there is a 26 % chance that they are aged between 30 and 44 years old and a 23 % chance that they are aged between 45 and 64.
Descriptions:
Descriptions:
| Clinton | Trump | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Young Adults (18-29 years old) | 55 | 36 | 91 |
| Adults (30-44 years old) | 51 | 41 | 92 |
| Middle-Aged Adults (45-64 years old) | 44 | 52 | 96 |
| Seniors (65+ years old) | 45 | 52 | 97 |
| Total | 195 | 181 | 376 |
To find P(Clinton|Young Adult) and P(Trump|Young Adult), focus on the first row. Of the total 91 young adults who participated in the survey, 55 voted for Clinton and 36 voted for Trump. Knowing this, the desired conditional probabilities can be calculated. P(Clinton|Young Adult) &= 55/91 ≈ 0.60 [0.3cm] P(Trump|Young Adult) &= 36/91 ≈ 0.40 Consequently, the following two conclusions can be made.
In other words, if a person is selected at random among the surveyed young adults, there is a 60 % chance they voted for Clinton and a 40 % chance they voted for Trump.
P(Adult|Clinton) &= 51/195 [0.2cm] &≈ 0.26 [0.3cm] P(Middle-Aged Adult|Clinton) &= 44/195 [0.2cm] &≈ 0.23 Consequently, the following two conclusions can be made.
In other words, if a person that voted for Clinton is selected at random, there is a 26 % probability that they are between 30 and 44 years old and a 23 % probability that they are between 45 and 64.
P(Clinton|Middle-Aged Adult) &= 44/96 [0.2cm] &≈ 0.46 Consequently, knowing that a person is a middle-aged adult, the probability that they voted for Clinton is about 46 %. Next, to find P(Middle-Aged Adult|Trump), focus on the second column of the table. A total of 181 people voted for Trump, and 52 of those are middle-aged adults. P(Middle-Aged Adult|Trump) &= 52/181 [0.2cm] &≈ 0.29 In conclusion, knowing that someone voted for Trump, there is a 29 % probability that they are between 45 and 64 years old.
P(Senior|Clinton) &= 45/195 ≈ 0.23 Consequently, knowing that a person voted for Clinton, the probability that they are a senior is about 23 %. Next, to find P(Trump|Senior), the fourth row will be analyzed. Of the total 97 seniors that were surveyed, 52 voted for Trump. P(Trump|Senior) &= 52/97 ≈ 0.54 In conclusion, knowing that someone is older than 64 years old, there is a 54 % chance that they voted for Trump.
Last month, Ignacio got a part-time job working from 4:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. during weekdays. Ignacio, who knows statistics, said to his peers that the events of taking a nap after lunch and being late for work are independent. However, Tadeo, who does not know much about statistics, does not understand what Ignacio meant.
| Late | On Time | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nap | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| No Nap | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| Total | 5 | 15 | 20 |
According to this data, is it true that the events claimed by Ignacio are independent?
The events of taking a nap after lunch and being late for work are independent.
Ignacio is saying that the probability that he is late for work is the same whether or not he takes a nap after lunch. Therefore, on the days that Ignacio is late for work, the nap is not the cause. With this explanation, Tadeo will hopefully understand what Ignacio meant.
Ignacio taking a nap after lunchand
Ignacio being late for workare independent using the data from the table. Remember, if two events A and B are independent, then P(A) is equal to P(A|B). Therefore, the following equation needs to be checked.
P( Late) ? = P( Late| Nap) To find P(Late), the number of days Ignacio is late must be counted. From the table, Ignacio is late on 5 days. Then, this number will be divided by the total number of days, which is 20. P( Late) = 5/20 = 1/4 To find P( Late| Nap), the number of days that Ignacio takes a nap and is late must be counted. From the table, this happens on 2 days. Next, this number will be divided by the total number of days in which Ignacio takes a nap, which is 8. P( Late| Nap) = 2/8 = 1/4 Since P( Late) and P( Late| Nap) are both equal to 14, the events are independent. Consequently, Ignacio was correct when he said that being late for work has nothing to do with taking a nap after lunch.
In Maya's new neighborhood, some people have dogs, cats, both, or neither. The following diagram shows the distribution of pets, but Maya has not seen it.
Consequently, there are 69+45=114 people that have exactly one type of pet. Next, the total number of people living in the neighborhood should be found. Number of People 69+45+15+61 = 190 Dividing 114 by 190, the probability that a person chosen at random has exactly one type of pet can be found. P(Exactly one pet type) = 114/190 = 0.6 Therefore, there is a 60 % chance that Maya is correct in thinking that Ignacio has exactly one type of pet.
Notice that as they are written, these probabilities represent the same situation. However, Maya knows that Magdalena does not have a cat and that Dylan does not have a dog. With this information, the above probabilities can be rewritten.
These are conditional probabilities. Since there are only two types of pets in the survey, the above statement can be written more precisely.
Now that all information is written, the first probability can be found. P(Dog|No Cat) = People who have a dog but not a cat/People who do not have a cat From the diagram, a total of 130 people do not have a cat, and 69 of those people have a dog. P(Dog|No Cat) = 69/130 ≈ 0.53 Therefore, there is about 53 % chance that Magdalena has a dog. The second probability can be found in a similar fashion. P(Cat|No Dog) = People who have a cat but not a dog/People who do not have a dog Using the diagram one more time, a total of 106 people do not have a dog, and 45 of those have a cat. P(Cat|No Dog) = 45/106 ≈ 0.42 Then, there is about 42 % chance that Dylan has a cat. Comparing the two obtained probabilities, the first is greater. Consequently, Magdalena is more likely to have a dog than Dylan is to have a cat.
By the Complement Rule, the following pair of conclusions can also be drawn.
From the four statements, Maya could safely ask Magdalena about her dog, but she should not ask Dylan about his cat. Keep in mind that Magdalena might not have a dog despite the probabilities and conclusions. Similarly, Dylan might have a cat.
Tearrik wants to determine if there is a connection between age and music preference. To figure it out, he surveyed 120 people at the mall, asking their age and whether they prefer pop or classical music. After analyzing the data collected, he concluded that there is no connection at all.
| Pop | Classical | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 Years Old or Younger | |||
| Older Than 35 | 40 | ||
| Total | 45 | 120 |
Based on the conclusion made by Tearrik, complete the missing information in the two-way frequency table.
| Pop | Classical | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 Years Old or Younger | 30 | 50 | 80 |
| Older Than 35 | 15 | 25 | 40 |
| Total | 45 | 75 | 120 |
A person likes pop musicand
A person is older than 35 years oldare independent.
| Pop | Classical | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 Years Old or Younger | a | b | c |
| Older Than 35 | d | e | 40 |
| Total | 45 | f | 120 |
In the table, the grand total and two marginal frequencies are given. Knowing that the marginal frequencies in the total
row and column add to the grand total 120, the missing marginal frequencies can be calculated.
45+f = 120 c+40 = 120 ⇔ f = 75 c = 80
The obtained values can be added to the table.
| Pop | Classical | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 Years Old or Younger | a | b | 80 |
| Older Than 35 | d | e | 40 |
| Total | 45 | 75 | 120 |
To find the joint frequencies, the conclusion made by Tearrik will be used instead of a system of equations.
There is no connection between age and music preference.
One conclusion that can be drawn from the above statement is that the probability that someone older than 35 likes pop music is the same as the probability that any person likes pop. Consequently, the following equation can be written. P(Pop| >35) = P(Pop) By the definition of conditional probability, the right-hand side of this equation can be rewritten. P(Pop|> 35) = A person likes pop and is over35/A person is older than35 From the table, 40 people are older than 35 and d of those like pop music. P(Pop| > 35) = d/40 On the other hand, the probability that someone likes pop music is the number of people who preferred pop music divided by the total number of people surveyed. P(Pop) = 45/120 = 3/8 The value of d can be found by substituting P(Pop|>35)= d40 and P(Pop)= 38 in the equation P(Pop|>35)=P(Pop).
P(Pop| > 35)= d/40, P(Pop)= 3/8
LHS * 40=RHS* 40
a/c* b = a* b/c
Calculate quotient
Therefore, there were 15 people older than 35 years old who preferred pop music.
| Pop | Classical | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 Years Old or Younger | a | b | 80 |
| Older Than 35 | 15 | e | 40 |
| Total | 45 | 75 | 120 |
The sum of the joint frequencies in a row equals the marginal frequency of the row. Similarly, the sum of the joint frequencies in a column equals the marginal frequency of the column. a+15 = 45 15+e= 40 ⇔ a = 30 e = 25 The obtained values can be added to the table.
| Pop | Classical | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 Years Old or Younger | 30 | b | 80 |
| Older Than 35 | 15 | 25 | 40 |
| Total | 45 | 75 | 120 |
The value of b can be found in a similar way. 30+b = 80 ⇔ b = 50 The table can be now completed!
| Pop | Classical | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 Years Old or Younger | 30 | 50 | 80 |
| Older Than 35 | 15 | 25 | 40 |
| Total | 45 | 75 | 120 |
Note that the conclusion made by Tearrik implies that the following pairs of events are independent.
A person likes pop musicand
A person is older than 35 years old.
A person likes pop musicand
A person is 35 years old or younger.
A person likes classical musicand
A person is older than 35 years old.
A person likes classical musicand
A person is 35 years old or younger.
Diego wants to throw a party at the end of the school year. To determine what kind of treats he should buy, he asked his 80 classmates whether they prefer cupcakes, cookies, donuts, or chocolate.
On the day of the party, Diego puts the treats on a table.
Diego: & I need to know the & gender of the person. [0.2cm] Mark: & No. The probability that a & person prefers cookies does & not depend on their gender. Who is correct?
P(Mark& 🍩) ≠ P(🍩) Since Mark is a boy, the probability that he chooses a donut is the same as the probability of a person choosing a donut knowing that they are a boy. P(Mark& 🍩) = P(🍩|Boy) By the definition of conditional probability, the right-hand side of the equation can be rewritten as follows. P(Mark& 🍩) = #(🍩 and Boy)/#Boys From the table, the number of boys who prefer donuts is 13 and the total number of boys is 45. With this information, the probability that Mark chooses a donut can be determined.
Substitute values
Calculate quotient
Convert to percent
Round to nearest integer
Consequently, the probability that Mark will choose a donut is about 29 %.
P(LaShay& 🧁) = P(🧁|Girl) The right-hand side of the previous equation equals the number of girls that prefer cupcakes divided by the total number of girls. P(LaShay& 🧁) = #(🧁and Girl)/#Girls From the table, the number of girls that prefer cupcakes is 8, and the total number of girls is 35. These values can be substituted into the previous equation.
Substitute values
Calculate quotient
Convert to percent
Round to nearest integer
Consequently, there is 23 % of chance that LaShay chooses a cupcake from the table.
P(Dylan | 🧁) and P(Emily | 🧁) Since Dylan is a boy and Emily is a girl, the previous probabilities can be written in terms of gender. This way, the data from the table can be used. P(Boy | 🧁) and P(Girl | 🧁) Now, find the conditional probability that Diego asked a boy for the treat, knowing that he was given a cupcake. P(Boy | 🧁) = #(Boys and🧁)/#🧁 From the table, 15 people prefer cupcakes and 7 of them are boys.
Substitute values
Calculate quotient
Convert to percent
Round to nearest integer
Next, find the conditional probability that Diego asked a girl for the treat, knowing that he was given a cupcake. P(Girl | 🧁) = #(Girls and🧁)/#🧁 From the table, there are 8 girls that prefer cupcakes.
Substitute values
Calculate quotient
Convert to percent
Round to nearest integer
Comparing the two probabilities, the second is greater. Therefore, knowing that Diego was given a cupcake, he is more likely to have asked a girl for the treat. Consequently, Diego is more likely to have asked Emily for the treat.
P(Chocolate|Boy) ⇕ Probability that a person prefers chocolate given they are a boy. In other words, the given expression represents the chance of a boy preferring chocolate. To find it, the number of boys that like chocolate will be divided by the total number of boys. P(🍫|Boy) = #(🍫 and Boy)/#Boys From the table, there are 16 boys that like chocolate, and the total number of boys is 45.
Substitute values
Calculate quotient
Convert to percent
Round to nearest integer
The probability that a person prefers chocolate given that they are a boy is about 36 %.
P(🍪) = #(People that prefer🍪)/# People However, Diego thinks that the gender of a person affects this probability. He thinks that the probability of a person preferring cookies varies depending on whether they are a boy or a girl. That is, Diego is considering the following conditional probabilities. P(🍪|Boy) and P(🍪|Girl) In contrast, Mark says that gender has no influence. To determine who is correct, find and compare the three probabilities. Start by finding P(🍪). From the table, the total number of people is 80 and 16 of them prefer cookies.
Substitute values
a/b=.a /16./.b /16.
Now, the probability that a person prefers cookies given that they are a boy is obtained by dividing the number of boys that prefer cookies by the total number of boys. P(🍪|Boy) = #(Boys and🍪)/# Boys From the table, there are 9 boys that like cookies and the total number of boys is 45.
Substitute values
a/b=.a /9./.b /9.
Similarly, the probability that a person prefers cookies given that they are a girl is calculated by dividing the number of girls who prefer cookies 7 by the total number of girls 35.
Substitute values
a/b=.a /7./.b /7.
As can be seen, the three probabilities found are equal. P(🍪) = P(🍪|Boy) = P(🍪|Girl) This implies that the probability that a person prefers cookies is the same, no matter whether they are a boy or a girl. Consequently, Mark is correct in saying that Diego does not need to know the gender of the person.
Davontay took a multiple-choice test where each question had two choices. He randomly guessed the answers to all the five questions in the test.
Let A be the event of guessing the answer to the second question correctly. Let B be the event of guessing correctly on the fifth question.
P(A⋂ B) = P(A)* P(B) To find the probabilities involved, the sample space will be first written. Let C represent a correct answer and I represent an incorrect answer. Using these variables, all the possible outcomes in the sample space can be listed.
By adding the number of possible outcomes of each case, there are 32 possible outcomes in the sample space. Of the 32 outcomes, there are 16 that satisfy event A and 16 that satisfy event B.
With this data, the probability of events A and B can be found. P(A) &= 16/32 = 1/2 [0.3cm] P(B) &= 16/32 = 1/2 Next, to find P(A⋂ B), the number of outcomes that are common for both events will be counted.
There are 8 outcomes that satisfy both events. P(A⋂ B) = 8/32 = 1/4 Finally, substitute P(A), P(B), and P(A⋂ B) into the initial equation to see if a true statement is obtained.
Substitute values
Multiply fractions
Since a true statement was obtained, A and B are independent events.
The events being independent means that having guessed the second question correctly does not influence having guessed the fifth question correctly and vice versa.
In a newly constructed apartment building, any apartment less than 450 square meters is classified as a studio. Of all the apartments, 20 % are non-studio apartments. The most desirable apartments are on the top two floors. On these floors, we find 80 % of the non-studio apartments and 10 % of the studio apartments in the building.
What is the probability that a randomly selected apartment on either of the top two floors is a studio apartment? Answer with a fraction in its simplest form.
From the exercise, we know that 20 % of all apartments in the building are non-studio apartments. This means that 80 % are studio apartments. Let's draw a two-way table to represent this.
We also know that 80 % of all non-studio apartments in the building are found on the top two floors, as are 10 % of all of the studio apartments. With this information, we can calculate the percentages of non-studio and studio apartments on the top two floors.
Now we see that 24 % of all apartments in the building are located on the top two floors. Now we have enough information to calculate the conditional probability of an apartment on the top two floors being a studio. P(studio|top two floors)=0.08/0.24=1/3