Sign In
Congruence and similarity are key concepts in geometry that describe relationships between shapes. Congruent figures are identical in shape and size, while similar figures have the same shape but may differ in size. These relationships are explored through rigid motions, which preserve distance and angles, and similarity transformations, which help identify how one figure can be resized while maintaining its proportions. Understanding corresponding parts and properties of similar polygons allows for comparing shapes and determining if they are congruent or similar. These concepts are widely used in fields like architecture, engineering, and design, where accurate measurements and proportionality are crucial. By mastering these ideas, individuals can apply geometric principles to solve real-world problems that involve shape, size, and scale.
Show less Show more expand_more| Student Learning Objectives: |
|---|
|
| | 14 Theory slides |
| | 13 Exercises - Grade E - A |
| | Each lesson is meant to take 1-2 classroom sessions |
Paulina loves art class. She paints any chance she gets which is why she has a lot of paper in different formats at home. Take a look at the relationship between two of those sheets of paper.
A rigid motion, or isometry, is a transformation that preserves the distance between any two points on the preimage. AB=A'B' The following diagram displays two logos. The logo with the points A and B is the preimage, and the logo with the points A' and B' is the image. The image is the result of a rigid motion because the distances between all points are preserved.
Rigid motions are also called congruence transformations. That is because the preimage and its image under a rigid motion are congruent figures. Some examples of rigid motions are translations, reflections, and rotations.
Notice that this type of transformation also preserves the angle measures of the figure. However, its position and orientation can sometimes be affected.
Two figures are congruent figures if there is a rigid motion or sequence of rigid motions that maps one of the figures onto the other. As a result, congruent figures have the same size and shape. To denote algebraically that two figures are congruent, the symbol ≅
is used.
ABCDE ≅ JKLMN or CDEAB ≅ LMNJK
Consider different pairs of figures. Are they congruent figures or not?
There is also a type of transformation that creates an image that is not identical, but very similar to its preimage.
A combination of rigid motions and dilations is called a similarity transformation. The scale factor of a similarity transformation is the product of the scale factors of the dilations.
Two figures are similar figures if there is a composition of similarity transformations that maps one figure onto the other. In other words, two figures are similar if they have the same shape and the ratios of their corresponding linear measures are equal. The symbol ~
indicates that two figures are similar.
ABCD~ JKLM or CDAB~ LMJK
The same definition applies to three-dimensional shapes.
ABCDEFGH~ JKLMNOPR
Consider two figures. One figure is the image of the other under a transformation. The pairs formed by a part of the preimage — a side, angle, or vertex — and the image of that part are called corresponding parts. For example, in the following applet, A and P are corresponding vertices.
| Congruent or Similar? | Relationship |
|---|---|
| Congruent | The corresponding sides and angles of the figures are congruent. |
| Similar | The corresponding sides of the figures are proportional.
The corresponding angles of the figures are also congruent. |
Two polygons are similar if and only if both of the following two properties hold.
Consider a pair of similar polygons. Notice how both of these properties hold for these polygons.
As Paula walked home from art school, snow began to calmly fall. She became giddy with excitement and hoped to catch snowflakes on her gloves. She noticed two large ones.
The length of the first snowflake is 3 millimeters. What is the length of the second snowflake?
The angle between two adjacent tips on the first snowflake is 60^(∘). What is the measure of the corresponding angle on the second snowflake?
Use the definition of congruent figures.
Congruent figures have the same size and shape.
It is a given that the two snowflakes on Paulina's gloves are congruent. Recall that congruent figures have the same size and shape. That fact is proven by the diagram that shows two identical looking snowflakes.
It is given that the length of the first snowflake is 3 millimeters. Since the snowflakes are congruent, the length of the second snowflake must also be 3 millimeters.
This time the measure of an angle on the second snowflake must be found. Once again, start by analyzing the appearance of both snowflakes.
The congruence of the snowflakes indicates that they are identical and have the same lengths and angle measures. That means the corresponding angle on the second snowflake has the same measure of 60^(∘).
On the weekend, Paulina went to the Mathimartical Gallery, which presents pieces of art that are in some way related to math. One room was dedicated to similar and congruent forms.
The two picture frames showing the footprints and leaves have similar shapes. The width of the larger frame is 5.6 feet and the width of the smaller frame is 4.2 feet. What is the scale factor from the smaller frame to the larger one?
Some leaves on the picture in the smaller frame also have similar shapes. The length of the left smaller red leaf is 6 inches and the length of a larger red leaf is 10 inches. What is the scale factor from the smaller leaf to the larger leaf?
Use the definition of a scale factor.
Divide the length of one leaf by the length of the other leaf.
Begin by recalling the definition of a scale factor.
|
Scale Factor |
|
A scale factor of two similar figures is the quotient of the measure of one figure and the measure of the other figure. |
The width of the larger frame is measured to be 5.6 feet and the width of the smaller frame is 4.2 feet.
To find the scale factor from the smaller frame to the larger one, divide 4.2 by 5.6 and simplify the quotient. Scale Factor=4.2/5.6=0.75 Therefore, the scale factor between the smaller and larger frame is 0.75.
The scale factor from the larger leaf to the smaller leaf needs to be found. The smaller leaf is 6 inches long and the larger leaf is 10 inches long.
Calculate the scale factor by dividing 6 inches by 10 inches and simplify. Scale Factor=6/10=0.6 The scale factor from the smaller leaf to the larger leaf equals 0.6.
Paulina goes on to enter The Room of Games! She notices beautifully crafted chess sets and playing cards. Their details are different sizes depending on the piece and card. The purpose of the room is clear to her — similarities and congruence in shapes are being displayed across various games.
The two pawns are similar figures with a scale factor from the smaller to the greater pawn of 1.5. If the height of the smaller pawn is 5.8 centimeters, what is the height of the bigger pawn?
The two cards — the Queen of Diamonds and the Four of Diamonds — have similar shapes with the scale factor from the bigger card to the smaller card of 0.9. If the top angle on the diamond on the smaller card is 72^(∘), what is the top angle on the diamond on the bigger card?
Multiply the scale factor by the height of the smaller pawn.
The angle measures of similar figures are congruent.
It is known that the two pawns are similar figures. This means that their dimensions have the same ratio and are related to each other by a scale factor. In this case, it equals 1.5.
Scale Factor=1.5 The height of the smaller pawn is 5.8 centimeters. Find the height of the bigger pawn by multiplying 5.8 by the scale factor of 1.5. 5.8* 1.5=8.7cm The height of the bigger pawn is 8.7 centimeters.
The two cards are said to be similar figures where the Queen of Diamonds is a smaller card and Four of Diamonds is a bigger card. Recall that similar figures have congruent angles. The measure of the top angle of the diamond on the smaller card is 72^(∘).
Top Angle=72^(∘) This means that the measure of the top angle of the diamond on the bigger card is also 72^(∘).
Consider two similar figures. Using the given information, find the scale factor rounded to two decimal places or the length of either of the figures rounded to the closest integer.
Paulina entered the final room of the gallery. It is dedicated to congruent and similar figures in architecture. There is a model of an old castle with two towers with congruent shapes.
Notice that the roofs of the towers in front of the castle look like congruent triangles.
The height of the rooftop of the tower on the left is 10 feet and its base is 8 feet wide. Calculate the ratio of the height to base by dividing 10 by 8. Ratio of Left Tower Roof=10/8=1.25 Since the towers have congruent shapes, the height of the roof of the right tower is also 10 feet and its base is 8 feet wide. Find the ratio of the height to the base of the right tower's roof as well. Ratio of Right Tower Roof=10/8=1.25
The calculations show that the ratio of the height to the base is the same for both triangles. This means that ratios of congruent polygons side lengths are equal.
Maya was asked to describe a sequence of transformations that maps △ DEF onto △ D'E'F' given that DEF≅ D'E'F'.
She incorrectly said the sequence of transformations that maps △ DEF onto △ D'E'F' is a reflection across the x-axis, followed by a translation 6 units right and 4 units up. What mistake did Maya likely make?
Maya was asked to describe a sequence of transformations that maps △ DEF onto △ D'E'F', where △ DEF onto △ D'E'F' are congruent. Here is her answer.
We know that the given sequence is incorrect. We want to find the mistake that Maya likely made. For that, let's first recreate her steps. Here are the triangles DEF and D'E'F'.
First, Maya mentions a reflection across the x-axis. Let's do that!
The next mentioned transformation is a translation 6 units right and 4 units up. Let's perform this transformation on the reflected triangle DEF.
This sequence of transformations did not map △ DEF onto D'E'F'. We can see that instead of translating △ DEF to the right, Maya should have translated it to the left. This is the mistake she made. Let's then go one step back and translate DEF 6 units left and 4 units up.
We have successfully mapped △ DEF onto △ D'E'F'. This way we found the correct sequence of transformations.