Sign In
Substitute the table's value for aluminum and I(x)=0.3I_0 and solve for x.
Substitute the table's value for copper and I(x)=0.3I_0 and solve for x.
Substitute the table's value for lead and I(x)=0.3I_0 and solve for x.
See solution.
x≈ 2.80
x≈ 0.38
x≈ 0.03
See solution.
Like the hint says, we want to solve for x when I(x)= 0.3I_0. Also, since we are investigating aluminum, we should substitute μ=0.43 in the formula. Then, we should isolate the term containing the variable.
I(x)= 0.3I_0, μ= 0.43
.LHS /I_0.=.RHS /I_0.
Rearrange equation
Now that the term with the variable as an exponent is isolated, we should notice that the base is e. This means that, to get to the exponent, we should take the natural logarithm of both sides.
ln(LHS)=ln(RHS)
The thickness of the aluminum shielding should be about 2.8 cm thick to reduce the intensity of the X-rays to 30 %.
Let's repeat the procedure from Part A but change the value of μ to reflect copper shielding.
I(x)= 0.3I_0, μ= 3.2
.LHS /I_0.=.RHS /I_0.
Rearrange equation
Now that the term with the variable as an exponent is isolated, we should notice that the base is e. This means that, to get to the exponent, we should take the natural logarithm of both sides.
ln(LHS)=ln(RHS)
The thickness of the copper shielding should be 0.38 cm thick to reduce the intensity of the X-rays to 30 %.
Let's repeat the procedure from Parts A and B but change the value of μ to reflect lead shielding.
I(x)= 0.3I_0, μ= 43
.LHS /I_0.=.RHS /I_0.
Rearrange equation
Now that the term with the variable as an exponent is isolated, we should notice that the base is e. This means that, to get to the exponent, we should take the natural logarithm of both sides.
ln(LHS)=ln(RHS)
The thickness of the lead shielding should be 0.03 cm thick to reduce the intensity of the X-rays to 30 %.
From previous parts, we know that the following thicknesses of aluminum, copper, and lead, are required to reduce the intensity of X-rays to 30 % of their initial intensity.