Big Ideas Math Integrated I, 2016
BI
Big Ideas Math Integrated I, 2016 View details
2. Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Continue to next subchapter

Exercise 23 Page 456

Does the conclusion of the first conditional statement match the hypothesis of the second conditional statement?

If a figure is a rhombus, then the figure has two pairs of opposite sides that are parallel

Practice makes perfect

According to the Law of Syllogism, we know the following. &1. If hypothesis p, then conclusion q. [0.5em] &2. If hypothesis q, then conclusion r. &3. If hypothesis p, then conclusion r. Notice that the conclusion of the first conditional statement matches the hypothesis of the second conditional statement. Let's write the two conditional statements side-by-side. &1. If a figure is a rhombus, &then the figure is a parallelogram. [0.5em] &2. If a figure is a parallelogram, &then the figure has two pairs of &opposite sides that are parallel. &3. If a figure is a rhombus, &then the figure has two pairs of & opposite sides that are parallel. The two conditional statements allow us to use the Law of Syllogism to write a third conditional statement.